Loss and damage from climate change and implicit assumptions of sustainable development
Loss and damage from climate change and implicit assumptions of sustainable development
复制标题
气候变化造成的损失和损害以及可持续发展的隐含假设
DOI：
10.1007/s10584-021-02970-z
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
4.8
通讯作者：
Boda C
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Boda C
2013年华沙国际机制（WIM）将气候变化造成的损失和损害视为一个独特的研究和政策领域，引起了气候科学家和政策制定者越来越多的关注。被一些人称为国际气候制度的“第三支柱”--与减缓和适应一起--有人认为，损失和损害有可能催化与其他国际议程，特别是可持续发展的重要协同作用。然而，为损失和损害研究提供信息的可持续发展的具体方法以及这些方法如何影响研究结果和政策建议在很大程度上仍未得到探讨。我们提供了一个可持续发展的假设，通过对损失和损害的同行评审研究的全面审查，支持损失和损害奖学金的系统分析。我们表明，使用特定的指标，决策标准，和政策处方的损失和损害的研究人员和从业人员意味着不自觉地坚持不同的可持续发展的基本理论，这反过来又影响如何损失和损害的概念化和应用。除了研究和政策的影响，我们的审查表明，可持续发展的目标的假设确定如何损失和损害的概念化，测量和管理，人类发展的方法目前代表了最先进的可持续发展的观点，从而损失和损害。这篇评论支持可持续发展作为一个连贯的，全面的，综合的框架，指导进一步的概念和经验的发展损失和损害奖学金。
Loss and damage from climate change, recognized as a unique research and policy domain through the Warsaw International Mechanism (WIM) in 2013, has drawn increasing attention among climate scientists and policy makers. Labelled by some as the “third pillar” of the international climate regime—along with mitigation and adaptation—it has been suggested that loss and damage has the potential to catalyze important synergies with other international agendas, particularly sustainable development. However, the specific approaches to sustainable development that inform loss and damage research and how these approaches influence research outcomes and policy recommendations remain largely unexplored. We offer a systematic analysis of the assumptions of sustainable development that underpins loss and damage scholarship through a comprehensive review of peer-reviewed research on loss and damage. We demonstrate that the use of specific metrics, decision criteria, and policy prescriptions by loss and damage researchers and practitioners implies an unwitting adherence to different underlying theories of sustainable development, which in turn impact how loss and damage is conceptualized and applied. In addition to research and policy implications, our review suggests that assumptions about the aims of sustainable development determine how loss and damage is conceptualized, measured, and governed, and the human development approach currently represents the most advanced perspective on sustainable development and thus loss and damage. This review supports sustainable development as a coherent, comprehensive, and integrative framework for guiding further conceptual and empirical development of loss and damage scholarship.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.04.002
发表时间：
2017-08-01
影响因子：
5
作者：
Cabral, Pedro;Augusto, Gabriela;Santha, Rubini
通讯作者：
Santha, Rubini
通过华沙机制框架减轻因气候变化而流离失所者的损失
DOI：
10.1080/21550085.2017.1342955
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
Ethics, Policy & Environment
影响因子：
--
作者：
Megs S. Gendreau
通讯作者：
Megs S. Gendreau
华沙国际气候变化影响损失和损害机制下的化石燃料资助气候灾害应对基金
影响因子：
4.3
作者：
R. Lyster
通讯作者：
R. Lyster
DOI：
10.1080/21550085.2017.1342962
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
Ethics, Policy & Environment
影响因子：
--
作者：
C. Preston
通讯作者：
C. Preston
“损失和损坏”能承担重担吗？
DOI：
10.1098/rsta.2017.0070
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
影响因子：
--
作者：
Robert R. M. Verchick
通讯作者：
Robert R. M. Verchick