Progressive Retinal Degeneration Increases Cortical Response Latency of Light Stimulation but Not of Electric Stimulation.
Progressive Retinal Degeneration Increases Cortical Response Latency of Light Stimulation but Not of Electric Stimulation.
复制标题
进行性视网膜变性会增加光刺激的皮质反应潜伏期,而不是电刺激的潜伏期。
DOI:
10.1167/tvst.11.4.19
复制
发表时间:
2022-04-01
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
Weiland, James D.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Koo, Beomseo;Weiland, James D.
关键词:
The brain is known to change functionally and structurally in response to blindness, but less is known about the effects of restoration of cortical input on brain function. Here, we present a preliminary study to observe alterations in visual and electrical evoked cortical potentials as a function of age in a clinically relevant animal model of retinitis pigmentosa. We recorded brain potentials elicited by light (visual evoked potentials [VEPs]) or corneal electrical stimulation (electrical evoked response [EER]) in retinal degenerate animal model LE-P23H-1. We used a linear mixed model to examine the effects of age on latency and amplitude of VEP and EER age groups P120, P180, and P360. VEP N1, P1, and N2 latency and amplitude were analyzed across animal age. For 1 Hz VEP, N1 latency increased significantly with animal age (slope = 0.053 ± 0.020 ms/day, P < 0.01). For 10 Hz VEP, N1, P1, and N2 latency increased significantly with animal age (slope = 0.104 ± 0.011, 0.135 ± 0.011, 0.087 ± 0.023 ms/day, and P < 0.001 for all VEP peaks). Conversely, EER latency did not change with age. Signal amplitude of VEP or EER did not change with age. Cortical potentials evoked by electrical stimulation of the retina do not diminish in spite of continued retinal degeneration in P23H rats. These findings suggest that retinal bioelectronic treatments of retinitis pigmentosa will activate cortex consistently despite variations in outer retinal degeneration. Clinical studies of retinal stimulation should consider varying retinitis pigmentosa genotypes as part of the experimental design.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Monai N;Yamauchi K;Tanabu R;Gonome T;Ishiguro SI;Nakazawa M
通讯作者:
Nakazawa M
影响因子:
41.2
作者:
Maya-Vetencourt JF;Ghezzi D;Antognazza MR;Colombo E;Mete M;Feyen P;Desii A;Buschiazzo A;Di Paolo M;Di Marco S;Ticconi F;Emionite L;Shmal D;Marini C;Donelli I;Freddi G;Maccarone R;Bisti S;Sambuceti G;Pertile G;Lanzani G;Benfenati F
通讯作者:
Benfenati F
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Hanif AM;Kim MK;Thomas JG;Ciavatta VT;Chrenek M;Hetling JR;Pardue MT
通讯作者:
Pardue MT
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Berger A;Cavallero S;Dominguez E;Barbe P;Simonutti M;Sahel JA;Sennlaub F;Raoul W;Paques M;Bemelmans AP
通讯作者:
Bemelmans AP
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
LaVail MM;Nishikawa S;Steinberg RH;Naash MI;Duncan JL;Trautmann N;Matthes MT;Yasumura D;Lau-Villacorta C;Chen J;Peterson WM;Yang H;Flannery JG
通讯作者:
Flannery JG