Elite bilingual identities in higher education in the Anglophone world: the stratification of linguistic diversity and reproduction of socio-economic inequalities in the multilingual student population

Elite bilingual identities in higher education in the Anglophone world: the stratification of linguistic diversity and reproduction of socio-economic inequalities in the multilingual student population
复制标题

英语世界高等教育中的精英双语身份:多语言学生群体中语言多样性的分层和社会经济不平等的再现

DOI:
10.1080/01434632.2018.1543692
复制
发表时间:
2019
影响因子:
2.3
通讯作者:
Preece S
Preece S
中科院分区:
人文科学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Preece S

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

随着英语世界的大学致力于在全球舞台上运作,该部门的语言多样性得到了加强。从历史上看,高等教育一直采用以语言为问题的导向来管理语言多样性,将多语种教学大纲视为主要障碍。一个以语言为资源为导向的新兴工作机构试图反驳这些不足的观点。然而,尽管是及时的,但它可能会将多语种学生群体视为一个同质群体。本文通过对来自不同社会经济背景的两组学生:工人阶级黑人和少数民族(BME)本科生和来自更多社会精英家庭的国际研究生,对他们的多语言能力的学生经历进行更细微的理解来解决这个问题。通过考察学生在该机构学习多种语言的经历,我展示了大学是如何对语言多样性进行分层的,我认为这与精英和平民对双语的看法是一致的。我认为,将语言作为资源的课程和教学法需要注意对语言多样性进行分层的制度做法,以避免加剧这样一种情况,即来自专业和社会精英群体的学生的多种语言能力得到加强,而工薪阶层BME学生的多种语言能力却收效甚微。
As universities in the Anglophone world attend to operating on a global stage, linguistic diversity in the sector has intensified. Historically, higher education has adopted language-as-problem orientations to managing linguistic diversity, viewing multilingual repertoires largely as an obstacle. An emerging body of work informed by language-as-resource orientations seeks to counter these deficit views. However, while timely, it risks treating the multilingual student population as a homogeneous group. This paper addresses this issue by developing a finer-grained understanding of student experiences of their multilingual repertoires with two groups of students from different socioeconomic backgrounds: working-class Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) undergraduate students and international postgraduate students from more socially elite families. By examining students’ experiences of their multilingual repertoires in the institution, I demonstrate how universities stratify the linguistic diversity in their midst, arguing that this is resonant with elite-plebeian views of bilingualism. I contend that language-as-resource informed curriculum and pedagogy needs to attend to institutional practices that stratify linguistic diversity to avoid reinforcing a situation in which the multilingualism of students from professional and socially elite groups is reinforced while little is gained when it comes to the multilingualism of working-class BME students.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2018
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
A. Binder
通讯作者: A. Binder
高等教育中的多语言身份:协商“母语”、“时髦”和“俚语”
DOI: --
发表时间: 2009
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
S. Preece
通讯作者: S. Preece
重新审视语言规划的方向:问题、权利和资源作为分析启发法
DOI: --
发表时间: 2016
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
F. Hult;N. Hornberger
通讯作者: N. Hornberger
权力、声望与双语:精英双语教育的国际视角
DOI: --
发表时间: 2002
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
A. Mejía
通讯作者: A. Mejía
DOI: --
发表时间: 2016
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Peter Skrandies
通讯作者: Peter Skrandies