Duration of SARS-CoV-2 shedding: A population-based, Canadian study.
Duration of SARS-CoV-2 shedding: A population-based, Canadian study.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0252217
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Groome PA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Phillips SP;Wei X;Kwong JC;Gubbay J;Schwartz KL;Majury A;Groome PA
There is an evidence gap regarding the duration of SARS-CoV-2 shedding and of its variability across different care settings and by age, sex, income, and co-morbidities. Such evidence is part of understanding of infectivity and reinfection. We examine direct measures of viral shedding using a linked population-based health administrative dataset. Laboratory and sociodemographic databases for Ontario, Canada were linked to identify those testing positive (RT-PCR) between Jan. 15 and April 30, 2020 who underwent subsequent testing by May 31, 2020. To maximise use of available data, we computed two shedding duration estimates defined as the time between initial positive and most recent positive (documented shedding) or second of two negative tests (documented resolution). We also report multivariable results using quantile regression to examine subgroup differences. In Ontario, of the 16,595 who tested positive before April 30, 2020, 6604 had sufficient subsequent testing to allow shedding duration calculation. Documented shedding median duration calculated in 4,889 (29% of 16,595) patients was 19 days (IQR 12–28). Documented resolution median duration calculated in 3,219 (19% of the 16,595) patients was 25 days (IQR 18–34). Long-term care residents had 3–5 day longer shedding durations using both definitions. Shorter documented shedding durations of 2–4 days were observed in those living in higher income neighbourhoods. Shorter documented resolution durations of 2–3 days were observed at the 25th% of the distribution in those aged 20–49. Only 11.5% of those with definitive negative test results reverted to negative status by day 14. Viral shedding continued well beyond 14 days among this large subset of a population-based group with COVID-19, and longer still for long-term care residents and those living in less affluent neighborhoods. Our findings do not speak to duration of infectivity but are useful for understanding the expected duration of RT-PCR positivity and for identifying reinfection.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
8.8
作者:
Xiao, Ai Tang;Tong, Yi Xin;Zhang, Sheng
通讯作者:
Zhang, Sheng
影响因子:
11.8
作者:
Bullard, Jared;Dust, Kerry;Poliquin, Guillaume
通讯作者:
Poliquin, Guillaume
影响因子:
82.9
作者:
He, Xi;Lau, Eric H. Y.;Leung, Gabriel M.
通讯作者:
Leung, Gabriel M.
影响因子:
13.3
作者:
Saurabh, S.;Kumar, R.;Misra, S.
通讯作者:
Misra, S.
影响因子:
16.6
作者:
Fajnzylber J;Regan J;Coxen K;Corry H;Wong C;Rosenthal A;Worrall D;Giguel F;Piechocka-Trocha A;Atyeo C;Fischinger S;Chan A;Flaherty KT;Hall K;Dougan M;Ryan ET;Gillespie E;Chishti R;Li Y;Jilg N;Hanidziar D;Baron RM;Baden L;Tsibris AM;Armstrong KA;Kuritzkes DR;Alter G;Walker BD;Yu X;Li JZ;Massachusetts Consortium for Pathogen Readiness
通讯作者:
Massachusetts Consortium for Pathogen Readiness