Second primary cancer risk - the impact of applying different definitions of multiple primaries: results from a retrospective population-based cancer registry study.
Second primary cancer risk - the impact of applying different definitions of multiple primaries: results from a retrospective population-based cancer registry study.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1186/1471-2407-14-272
复制
发表时间:
2014-04-18
期刊:
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
McLoone P
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Coyte A;Morrison DS;McLoone P
There is evidence that cancer survivors are at increased risk of second primary cancers. Changes in the prevalence of risk factors and diagnostic techniques may have affected more recent risks. We examined the incidence of second primary cancer among adults in the West of Scotland, UK, diagnosed with cancer between 2000 and 2004 (n = 57,393). We used National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results and International Agency for Research on Cancer definitions of multiple primary cancers and estimated indirectly standardised incidence ratios (SIR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). There was a high incidence of cancer during the first 60 days following diagnosis (SIR = 2.36, 95% CI = 2.12 to 2.63). When this period was excluded the risk was not raised, but it was high for some patient groups; in particular women aged <50 years with breast cancer (SIR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.58 to 2.78), patients with bladder (SIR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.19 to 1.67) and head & neck (SIR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.67 to 2.21) cancer. Head & neck cancer patients had increased risks of lung cancer (SIR = 3.75, 95% CI = 3.01 to 4.62), oesophageal (SIR = 4.62, 95% CI = 2.73 to 7.29) and other head & neck tumours (SIR = 6.10, 95% CI = 4.17 to 8.61). Patients with bladder cancer had raised risks of lung (SIR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.62 to 2.88) and prostate (SIR = 2.41, 95% CI = 1.72 to 3.30) cancer. Relative risks of second primary cancers may be smaller than previously reported. Premenopausal women with breast cancer and patients with malignant melanomas, bladder and head & neck cancers may benefit from increased surveillance and advice to avoid known risk factors.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.1
作者:
Mehnert, Anja;Koch, Uwe;Dinkel, Andreas
通讯作者:
Dinkel, Andreas
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
Liu, Lifang;Lemmens, Valery E. P. P.;Soerjomataram, Isabelle
通讯作者:
Soerjomataram, Isabelle
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Howel, Denise
通讯作者:
Howel, Denise
影响因子:
8.4
作者:
Crocetti, E;Buiatti, E;Falini, P
通讯作者:
Falini, P
影响因子:
6.4
作者:
Levi, Fabio;Randimbison, Lalao;La Vecchia, Carlo
通讯作者:
La Vecchia, Carlo