The Dutch version of the Child Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory: validation in a clinical sample and a school sample.
The Dutch version of the Child Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory: validation in a clinical sample and a school sample.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3402/ejpt.v6.26362
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
5
通讯作者：
Lindauer RJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Diehle J;de Roos C;Meiser-Stedman R;Boer F;Lindauer RJ
随着DSM-5创伤后应激障碍（PTSD）标准中创伤相关认知的纳入，对这些认知的评估变得至关重要。因此，评估这些认知的有效工具是必要的。目前的研究旨在验证荷兰版的儿童创伤后认知量表（CPTCI）。我们的研究纳入了8-19岁的儿童，并在临床样本（n=184）和学校样本（n=318）中评估了CPTCI的因素结构、信度和效度。我们的研究结果支持CPTCI的双因子结构，并在总量表和两个分量量表上显示出良好的内部一致性。我们发现CPTCI与创伤后应激障碍、抑郁和焦虑障碍之间存在显著的正相关。CPTCI与生活质量的测量呈负相关。此外，我们发现临床样本的得分明显高于学校样本。对于接受治疗的儿童，我们发现CPTCI评分的降低伴随着创伤后应激症状和合并症问题的减少，这表明CPTCI能够检测治疗效果。总的来说，我们的结果表明荷兰CPTCI是一个可靠和有效的工具。
With the inclusion of trauma-related cognitions in the DSM-5 criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the assessment of these cognitions has become essential. Therefore, valid tools for the assessment of these cognitions are warranted. The current study aimed at validating the Dutch version of the Child Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (CPTCI). We included children aged 8–19 years in our study and assessed the factor structure, reliability and validity of the CPTCI in a clinical sample (n=184) and a school sample (n=318). Our results supported the two-factor structure of the CPTCI and showed good internal consistency for the total scale and the two subscales. We found significant positive correlations between the CPTCI and measures of PTSD, depression, and anxiety disorder. The CPTCI correlated negatively with a measure of quality of life. Furthermore, we found significantly higher scores in the clinical sample than in the school sample. For children who received treatment, we found that a decrease in CPTCI scores was accompanied by a decrease in posttraumatic stress symptoms and comorbid problems indicating that the CPTCI is able to detect treatment effects. Overall, our results suggest that the Dutch CPTCI is a reliable and valid instrument.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1080/10705519909540118
发表时间：
1999-01-01
影响因子：
6
作者：
Hu, Li-tze;Bentler, Peter M.
通讯作者：
Bentler, Peter M.
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Muris, Peter;van der Pennen, Els;Sigmond, Rianne;Mayer, Birgit
通讯作者：
Mayer, Birgit
影响因子：
6.3
作者：
Mueller, Julia;Wessa, Michele;Karl, Anke
通讯作者：
Karl, Anke
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Palosaari, Esa;Punamaki, Raija-Leena;Qouta, Samir
通讯作者：
Qouta, Samir
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike;Erhart, Michael;Rajmil, Luis;Herdman, Michael;Auquier, Pascal;Bruil, Jeanet;Power, Mick;Duer, Wolfgang;Abel, Thomas;Czemy, Ladislav;Mazur, Joanna;Czimbalmos, Agnes;Tountas, Yannis;Hagquist, Curt;Kilroe, Jean
通讯作者：
Kilroe, Jean