Minimally important difference for the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form.
Minimally important difference for the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.044
复制
发表时间:
2015-01
期刊:
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
PROSTQA Consortium
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Skolarus TA;Dunn RL;Sanda MG;Chang P;Greenfield TK;Litwin MS;Wei JT;PROSTQA Consortium
To establish a score threshold that constitutes a clinically relevant change for each domain of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite - Short Form (EPIC-26). While its use in clinical practice and clinical trials has increased worldwide, the clinical interpretation of this 26-item disease-specific patient-reported quality of life questionnaire for men with localized prostate cancer would be facilitated by characterization of score thresholds for clinically relevant change (the minimally important differences, or MID). We used distribution- and anchor-based approaches to establish the MID range for each EPIC-26 domain (urinary, sexual, bowel, hormonal) based on a prospective, multi-institutional cohort of 1,201 men treated for prostate cancer between 2003 and 2006 and followed for 3 years after treatment. For the anchor-based approach, we compared within/between subject score changes for each domain to an external “anchor” measure of overall cancer treatment satisfaction. We found the bowel and vitality/hormonal domains to have the lowest MID range (a 4–6 point change should be considered clinically relevant), while the sexual domain had the greatest MID values (10–12). Urinary incontinence appeared to have a greater MID range (6–9) compared with the urinary irritation/obstruction domain (5–7). Using two independent approaches, we established the minimally important differences for each EPIC-26 domain. Definition of these MID values is essential for the researcher or clinician to understand when changes in symptom burden among prostate cancer survivors are clinically relevant.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
6.6
作者:
Hedgepeth, Ryan C.;Labo, Jessica;Wood, David P., Jr.
通讯作者:
Wood, David P., Jr.
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Jayadevappa, Ravishankar;Malkowicz, Stanley Bruce;Chhatre, Sumedha
通讯作者:
Chhatre, Sumedha
影响因子:
7.2
作者:
Eton, DT;Cella, D;Wood, WC
通讯作者:
Wood, WC
影响因子:
23.4
作者:
Schroeck, Florian R.;Krupski, Tracey L.;Moul, Judd W.
通讯作者:
Moul, Judd W.
影响因子:
23.4
作者:
Jacobs BL;Zhang Y;Skolarus TA;Wei JT;Montie JE;Miller DC;Hollenbeck BK
通讯作者:
Hollenbeck BK