Sweet flowers are slow, and weeds make haste: leveraging methodology from research on tobacco, alcohol, and opioid analgesics to make rapid and policy-relevant advances in cannabis science.
Sweet flowers are slow, and weeds make haste: leveraging methodology from research on tobacco, alcohol, and opioid analgesics to make rapid and policy-relevant advances in cannabis science.
复制标题
甜花很慢,杂草匆忙:从烟草,酒精和阿片类镇痛药的研究中利用方法,以在大麻科学方面取得快速且与政策相关的进步。
DOI:
10.1080/09540261.2018.1465400
复制
发表时间:
2018-06
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Peters EN
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Herrmann ES;Jarvis BP;Sparks AC;Cohn AM;Koszowski B;Rosenberry ZR;Coleman-Cowger VH;Pickworth WB;Peters EN
The legalization of medical and recreational cannabis use has occurred ahead of science. The current evidence base has poor utility for determining if cannabis products can meet the standards of safety, efficacy, and quality intrinsic to modern medicine, and for informing regulation of cannabis as a legal intoxicant. Individual jurisdictions that pass cannabis reforms may not have adequate resources to support the level of new scientific research needed to inform regulatory actions; this could make it difficult to keep a rapidly growing multi-billion-dollar cannabis industry in check. Further, the present lack of evidence-based regulatory oversight for cannabis parallels the climates that gave rise to the tobacco and prescription opioid epidemics, suggesting that continued omission may result in negative public health consequences. However, translating methodological framework developed through research on these compounds may promote rapid advances in cannabis science germane to regulatory knowledge gaps. The present review highlights specific advancements in these areas, as well as in alcohol regulation, that are prime for informing policy-relevant cannabis science, and also offers some recommendations for evidence-based regulatory policy. Resulting progress may directly inform both regulation of cannabis in both medical and licit recreational drug frameworks, and new cannabis-related public health initiatives.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.6
作者:
Crippa, Jose A. S.;Crippa, Ana C. S.;Zuardi, Antonio W.
通讯作者:
Zuardi, Antonio W.
影响因子:
7.6
作者:
Cooper, Ziva D.;Bedi, Gillinder;Haney, Margaret
通讯作者:
Haney, Margaret
DOI:
10.1001/jama.2016.1464
发表时间:
2016-04-19
期刊:
JAMA
影响因子:
--
作者:
Dowell D;Haegerich TM;Chou R
通讯作者:
Chou R
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Casswell, S;Maxwell, A
通讯作者:
Maxwell, A
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
Anderson, Peter;de Bruijn, Avalon;Hastings, Gerard
通讯作者:
Hastings, Gerard