Measurement equivalence of the Empowerment Scale for White and Black persons with severe mental illness.

Measurement equivalence of the Empowerment Scale for White and Black persons with severe mental illness.
复制标题

患有严重精神疾病的白人和黑人赋权量表的测量等效性。

DOI:
10.1037/prj0000069
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
1.9
通讯作者:
Neuhengen,Jonas
Neuhengen,Jonas
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Morris,ScottB;Huang,Jialin;Zhao,Lei;Sergent,JessicaD;Neuhengen,Jonas

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

目的本研究考察了心理健康服务的黑人和白色消费者个人赋权指标的测量等效性。方法采用验证性因素分析来评估28项赋权量表的测量等效性(Rogers,Chamberlin,Ellison和Crean,1997年),使用1,035白色和301黑人与严重的精神疾病。ResultsMetric不变性的授权规模的支持,在该因素结构和负载是跨组相等。3个项目违反了标量不变性;然而,这些项目对量表评分的影响很小。最后,子量表的授权往往是更高的相互关联的黑人比白色responders.Conclusions和影响PracticeResults一般支持使用授权量表的种族群体比较。然而,微妙的差异,心理测量特性的这一措施表明,黑人和白色个人可能概念化的建设,以不同的方式赋权。具体来说,黑人受访者有一个较低的门槛,赞同一些项目的自尊和无能为力的尺寸。此外,白色受访者认为赋权的3个维度(自尊,无能为力,和行动主义)更明显,而这3个特征更强烈地相互关联的黑人。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2020阿帕,保留所有权利)
ObjectiveThe current study examined the measurement equivalence on a measure of personal empowerment for Black and White consumers of mental health services.MethodConfirmatory factor analysis was used to assess measurement equivalence of the 28-item Empowerment Scale (Rogers, Chamberlin, Ellison, & Crean, 1997), using data from 1,035 White and 301 Black persons with severe mental illness.ResultsMetric invariance of the Empowerment Scale was supported, in that the factor structure and loadings were equivalent across groups. Scalar invariance was violated on 3 items; however, the impact of these items on scale scores was quite small. Finally, subscales of empowerment tended to be more highly intercorrelated for Black than for White respondents.Conclusions and Implications for PracticeResults generally support the use of Empowerment Scale for ethnic group comparisons. However, subtle differences in the psychometric properties of this measure suggest that Black and White individuals may conceptualize the construct of empowerment in different ways. Specifically, Black respondents had a lower threshold for endorsing some items on the self-esteem and powerlessness dimensions. Further, White respondents viewed the 3 dimensions of empowerment (self-esteem, powerlessness, and activism) as more distinct, whereas these 3 traits were more strongly interrelated for Blacks.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)
赋权量表在精神分裂症患者中的应用:日本经验
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2007.01723.x
发表时间: 2007
影响因子: 11.9
作者:
Sumie Yamada;Kunifumi Suzuki
通讯作者: Kunifumi Suzuki
DOI: 10.1177/109019819402100203
发表时间: 1994-06-01
期刊: HEALTH EDUCATION QUARTERLY
影响因子: --
作者:
ISRAEL, BA;CHECKOWAY, B;ZIMMERMAN, M
通讯作者: ZIMMERMAN, M
DOI: 10.1176/ps.2010.61.9.933
发表时间: 2010-09-01
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
Rogers, E. Sally;Ralph, Ruth O.;Salzer, Mark S.
通讯作者: Salzer, Mark S.
种族和自尊:比较白人、黑人、西班牙裔、亚洲人和美洲印第安人的荟萃分析以及对 Gray-Little 和 Hafdahl (2000) 的评论。
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.3.371
发表时间: 2002
影响因子: 22.4
作者:
J. Twenge;J. Crocker
通讯作者: J. Crocker
患有严重精神疾病的波多黎各裔美国人职业康复的人种学研究。
DOI: 10.1037/h0095262
发表时间: 1998
影响因子: 1.9
作者:
H. Alverson;E. Vicente
通讯作者: E. Vicente