Optimizing tissue clearing and imaging methods for human brain tissue.

Optimizing tissue clearing and imaging methods for human brain tissue.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/03000605211001729
复制
发表时间:
2021-03
期刊:
The Journal of international medical research
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Choi HJ
Choi HJ
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kim MS;Ahn JH;Mo JE;Song HY;Cheon D;Yoo SH;Choi HJ

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

To identify optimum sample conditions for human brains, we compared the clearing efficiency, antibody staining efficiency, and artifacts between fresh and cadaver samples. Fresh and cadaver samples were cleared using X-CLARITY™. Clearing efficiency and artifact levels were calculated using ImageJ, and antibody staining efficiency was evaluated after confocal microscopy imaging. Three staining methods were compared: 4-day staining (4DS), 11-day staining (11DS), and 4-day staining with a commercial kit (4DS-C). The optimum staining method was then selected by evaluating staining time, depth, method complexity, contamination, and cost. Fresh samples outperformed cadaver samples in terms of the time and quality of clearing, artifacts, and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining efficiency, but had a glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) staining efficiency that was similar to that of cadaver samples. The penetration depth and DAPI staining improved in fresh samples as the incubation period lengthened. 4DS-C was the best method, with the deepest penetration. Human brain images containing blood vessels, cell nuclei, and astrocytes were visualized three-dimensionally. The chemical dye staining depth reached 800 µm and immunostaining depth exceeded 200 µm in 4 days. We present optimized sample preparation and staining protocols for the visualization of three-dimensional macrostructure in the human brain.
立方病理:用于病理诊断的三维成像。
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-09117-0
发表时间: 2017-08-24
期刊: Scientific reports
影响因子: 4.6
作者:
Nojima S;Susaki EA;Yoshida K;Takemoto H;Tsujimura N;Iijima S;Takachi K;Nakahara Y;Tahara S;Ohshima K;Kurashige M;Hori Y;Wada N;Ikeda JI;Kumanogoh A;Morii E;Ueda HR
通讯作者: Ueda HR
DOI: 10.1038/s41583-019-0250-1
发表时间: 2020-02
期刊: Nature reviews. Neuroscience
影响因子: --
作者:
Ueda HR;Ertürk A;Chung K;Gradinaru V;Chédotal A;Tomancak P;Keller PJ
通讯作者: Keller PJ
DOI: 10.1038/srep18631
发表时间: 2016-01-11
期刊: Scientific reports
影响因子: 4.6
作者:
Lee E;Choi J;Jo Y;Kim JY;Jang YJ;Lee HM;Kim SY;Lee HJ;Cho K;Jung N;Hur EM;Jeong SJ;Moon C;Choe Y;Rhyu IJ;Kim H;Sun W
通讯作者: Sun W
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2481
发表时间: 2013-06-01
期刊: NATURE METHODS
影响因子: 48
作者:
Chung, Kwanghun;Deisseroth, Karl
通讯作者: Deisseroth, Karl
FDISCO:用于整个器官成像的先进溶剂型透明化方法
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aau8355
发表时间: 2019-01-01
期刊: SCIENCE ADVANCES
影响因子: 13.6
作者:
Qi, Yisong;Yu, Tingting;Zhu, Dan
通讯作者: Zhu, Dan