The intimacy of insurgency: beyond coercion, greed or grievance in Maoist India
The intimacy of insurgency: beyond coercion, greed or grievance in Maoist India
复制标题
叛乱的亲密性：毛主义印度超越胁迫、贪婪或不满
DOI：
10.1080/03085147.2013.783662
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Alpa Shah
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Alpa Shah
摘要毛主义运动被认为是印度抵制经济自由化政策的最强大力量之一。本文探讨了近年来这一运动是如何以及为什么蔓延的。本文分析了从胁迫、贪婪或不满的角度解释叛乱行动的理论，借鉴了对毛派游击区的长期民族志研究，探讨了迄今为止文献中未被充分发挥的动员的一个重要方面：动员部队与斗争地区人民之间发展的亲密关系。本文展示了家庭和亲属关系，交换及其期望，种姓及其表现形式的债券是如何理解革命动员的社会动力学至关重要。此外，它还表明，意识形态和政治组织之间的关系在形成亲密关系方面具有重要意义，而这反过来又可以解释组织的影响范围。因此，在印度的案例中，本文将毛派的传播与游击区中相互竞争的政治组织--印度政府和印度教右翼--进行了比较。正如亲密关系可能有助于解释为什么人们支持和加入激进运动一样，本文认为，他们与革命主体性的冲突关系也可能成为此类运动的阿喀琉斯之踵，解释了为什么人们疏远，离开和背叛他们，部分导致他们的衰落。
Abstract The Maoist movement has been presented as one of the most powerful forces of resistance against policies of economic liberalization in India. This paper explores how and why the movement has spread in recent years. Analysing beyond theories explaining insurgent action in terms of coercion, greed or grievance, the article draws on long-term ethnographic research in a Maoist guerrilla zone to explore an important aspect of mobilization that has been underplayed to date in the literature: the relations of intimacy which develop between the mobilizing forces and the people in the area of struggle. The paper shows how bonds of family and kinship, exchange and its expectations, caste and its manifestations are crucial for understanding the social dynamics of revolutionary mobilization. Moreover, it suggests that the relationship between ideology and political organization is significant in shaping the kinds of relations of intimacy developed, and that in turn this can explain the reach of the organization. In the Indian case, the paper thus compares the spread of the Maoists with competing political organizations in their guerrilla zones – the Indian State and the Hindu right. Just as relations of intimacy may help explain why people support and join radical movements, the paper suggests that their conflictual relationship with revolutionary subjectivity may also become the Achilles’ heel of such movements, explaining why people distance themselves from, leave and betray them, leading in part to their decline.
影响因子：
1.1
作者：
Shah A
通讯作者：
Shah A
在革命的印度寻找确定性
影响因子：
1.1
作者：
Shah A
通讯作者：
Shah A
国家的阴影下：印度贾坎德邦的土著政治、环保主义和叛乱
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Shah Alpa
通讯作者：
Shah Alpa