Making Pain Research More Inclusive: Why and How.
Making Pain Research More Inclusive: Why and How.
复制标题
使疼痛研究更具包容性：原因和方式。
DOI：
10.1016/j.jpain.2021.10.004
复制
发表时间：
2022-05
期刊：
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
Meghani, Salimah H.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Janevic, Mary R.;Mathur, Vani A.;Booker, Staja Q.;Morais, Calia;Meints, Samantha M.;Yeager, Katherine A.;Meghani, Salimah H.
关键词：
Current knowledge about mechanisms and interventions for pain has largely been derived from samples that are healthier, wealthier, younger, and more likely to be White than the general population. Failure to conduct inclusive pain research not only restricts generalizability and application of findings, but also hampers the discovery of mechanisms and the development of measures and interventions that are valid across population subgroups. Most of all, inclusive practices are critical to ensure that underrepresented groups derive equitable benefit from pain research. Here, we provide guidance for the pain research community on how to adopt inclusive research practices. We define “inclusion” to encompass a range of identities and characteristics, including racialized group/ethnicity, disability status, gender identity, sexual orientation, and age. We first describe principles relevant to promoting inclusion in pain research, including attention to: 1) stakeholder engagement; 2) structural factors underlying inequities; 3) the limitations of “disparity” research; 4) intersectionality; and 5) universal design. Next, we provide checklists with practical strategies for making studies more inclusive at each stage of the research process. We conclude by calling for system-level changes to ensure that the future of pain research is socially just, scientifically productive, and responsive to the needs of all people. This paper offers guidance on promoting inclusion of underrepresented groups in pain research. We describe principles relevant to conducting more inclusive research; e.g., attention to stakeholder engagement, structural factors, and universal design. We provide checklists with practical strategies for inclusion at each stage of the research process.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1353/cpr.2020.0041
发表时间：
2020-09-01
影响因子：
1.1
作者：
Eisenstein, Amy R.;Milstein, Laura;Berman, Rebecca
通讯作者：
Berman, Rebecca
DOI：
10.1073/pnas.2012350117
发表时间：
2020-10-06
影响因子：
11.1
作者：
Case A;Deaton A;Stone AA
通讯作者：
Stone AA
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Bauer, Greta R.;Scheim, Ayden I.
通讯作者：
Scheim, Ayden I.
性别异质工作组产生更高质量的科学。
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Campbell LG;Mehtani S;Dozier ME;Rinehart J
通讯作者：
Rinehart J
影响因子：
--
作者：
Dimond, Eileen P.;Zon, Robin T.;Grubbs, Stephen S.
通讯作者：
Grubbs, Stephen S.