Language as Description, Indication, and Depiction.
Language as Description, Indication, and Depiction.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00716
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Hodge G
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ferrara L;Hodge G
手势者和说话者在他们面对面互动的时空背景下协调广泛的有意表达行为。各种各样的符号学剧目以不同的方式组合联合收割机，其细节植根于特定时间和地点发生的相互作用。然而，语言学对常规化的符号形式/意义配对（特别是那些任意的）的强烈关注掩盖了其他符号学在面对面交流中的重要性。其结果是，由不同的存在方式（例如，聋人、听力正常的人）并不容易统一到一个全球性的理论框架中。在这里，我们促进语言的理论，占不同的人类如何协调他们的符号剧目在面对面的交流，汇集证据，从人类学，符号学，手势研究和语言学。我们的目的是促进不同的沟通生态的直接比较。我们建立在语言使用的理论，作为“行动”通过三种方法的信号：描述，指示和描绘。每种方法都是根本不同的，它们可以单独使用或与其他方法结合使用，在联合创建多模态“复合话语”。我们认为，语言的理论必须能够解释所有三种方法的信号，因为它们表现在复合话语内和跨。从这个角度来看，语言，而不仅仅是语言的使用，可以被看作是有意的交际行为，涉及特定范围的符号资源，可在现场的人类互动。
Signers and speakers coordinate a broad range of intentionally expressive actions within the spatiotemporal context of their face-to-face interactions. Varied semiotic repertoires combine in different ways, the details of which are rooted in the interactions occurring in a specific time and place. However, intense focus in linguistics on conventionalized symbolic form/meaning pairings (especially those which are arbitrary) has obscured the importance of other semiotics in face-to-face communication. A consequence is that the communicative practices resulting from diverse ways of being (e.g., deaf, hearing) are not easily united into a global theoretical framework. Here we promote a theory of language that accounts for how diverse humans coordinate their semiotic repertoires in face-to-face communication, bringing together evidence from anthropology, semiotics, gesture studies and linguistics. Our aim is to facilitate direct comparison of different communicative ecologies. We build on theory of language use as ‘actioned’ via three methods of signaling: describing, indicating, and depicting. Each method is fundamentally different to the other, and they can be used alone or in combination with others during the joint creation of multimodal ‘composite utterances’. We argue that a theory of language must be able to account for all three methods of signaling as they manifest within and across composite utterances. From this perspective, language—and not only language use—can be viewed as intentionally communicative action involving the specific range of semiotic resources available in situated human interactions.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
1.6
作者：
Bolden, G
通讯作者：
Bolden, G
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Busch, Brigitta
通讯作者：
Busch, Brigitta
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Clark, Herbert H.
通讯作者：
Clark, Herbert H.
影响因子：
0.8
作者：
Blythe, Joe;Mardigan, Kinngirri Carmelita;Stoakes, Hywel
通讯作者：
Stoakes, Hywel