Identification and utilization of a sow thistle powdery mildew as a poorly adapted pathogen to dissect post-invasion non-host resistance mechanisms in Arabidopsis.
Identification and utilization of a sow thistle powdery mildew as a poorly adapted pathogen to dissect post-invasion non-host resistance mechanisms in Arabidopsis.
复制标题
猪蓟白粉病作为一种适应性较差的病原体的鉴定和利用,以剖析拟南芥入侵后非宿主抗性机制
DOI:
10.1093/jxb/erq406
复制
发表时间:
2011-03
影响因子:
6.9
通讯作者:
Xiao S
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wen Y;Wang W;Feng J;Luo MC;Tsuda K;Katagiri F;Bauchan G;Xiao S
To better dissect non-host resistance against haustorium-forming powdery mildew pathogens, a sow thistle powdery mildew isolate designated Golovinomyces cichoracearum UMSG1 that has largely overcome penetration resistance but is invariably stopped by post-invasion non-host resistance of Arabidopsis thaliana was identified. The post-invasion non-host resistance is mainly manifested as the formation of a callosic encasement of the haustorial complex (EHC) and hypersensitive response (HR), which appears to be controlled by both salicylic acid (SA)-dependent and SA-independent defence pathways, as supported by the susceptibility of the pad4/sid2 double mutant to the pathogen. While the broad-spectrum resistance protein RPW8.2 enhances post-penetration resistance against G. cichoracearum UCSC1, a well-adapted powdery mildew pathogen, RPW8.2, is dispensable for post-penetration resistance against G. cichoracearum UMSG1, and its specific targeting to the extrahaustorial membrane is physically blocked by the EHC, resulting in HR cell death. Taken together, the present work suggests an evolutionary scenario for the Arabidopsis–powdery mildew interaction: EHC formation is a conserved subcellular defence evolved in plants against haustorial invasion; well-adapted powdery mildew has evolved the ability to suppress EHC formation for parasitic growth and reproduction; RPW8.2 has evolved to enhance EHC formation, thereby conferring haustorium-targeted, broad-spectrum resistance at the post-invasion stage.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.5
作者:
Mellersh, DG;Heath, MC
通讯作者:
Heath, MC
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Collins, NC;Thordal-Christensen, H;Schulze-Lefert, P
通讯作者:
Schulze-Lefert, P
影响因子:
7.2
作者:
Adam, L;Somerville, SC
通讯作者:
Somerville, SC
影响因子:
3.2
作者:
Heath, MC;Xu, HX;Eilam, T
通讯作者:
Eilam, T
影响因子:
56.9
作者:
Alonso, JM;Hirayama, T;Ecker, JR
通讯作者:
Ecker, JR