Safety Climate in MT Mining: A Case Study.

Safety Climate in MT Mining: A Case Study.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s42461-021-00472-1
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
Mining, metallurgy & exploration
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Gilkey D
Gilkey D
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Murphy T;Aldossari H;Birkenbuel L;Rosenthal S;Autenrieth D;McGivern M;Gilkey D

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

在一个露天金属矿山进行了安全气氛案例研究,调查人员对 365-368 名矿工进行了 Liberty Mutual 短期安全气氛调查,以衡量连续几年的安全气氛。继2019年基线安全氛围调查后,矿场对81名中高层管理人员进行了安全领导力基础(FSL)培训。调查人员发现,参加培训的中高层管理人员在培训前和培训后的 FSL 评估分数上存在显着差异。将后续安全氛围评估与基线分数进行比较,发现没有显着改善。公司安全氛围总体基线得分为 76.38,小幅上升至 76.50(p 值 = 0.616)。调查人员还评估了该公司三个主要部门(运营、维护和管理)之间安全氛围的差异。这两年行政部门的平均得分最高,而运营部门的平均得分最低。作者将三个主要部门之间的统计显着差异归因于他们工作环境的各种差异。
A safety climate case study was carried out at a surface metal mine where investigators administered the Liberty Mutual Short Scale Safety Climate Survey to 365–368 miners to measure safety climate in consecutive years. Following the baseline safety climate survey in 2019, Foundations for Safety Leadership (FSL) training was conducted with 81 middle to upper management employees at the mine site. Investigators found statistically significant differences in the pre vs. posttraining FSL assessment scores of the middle to upper management employees who attended the training. The follow-up safety climate evaluation was compared to baseline scores and revealed no significant improvement. The overall baseline company safety climate score of 76.38 increased minimally to 76.50 (p-value = 0.616). Investigators also evaluated differences in safety climate between the company’s three major divisions (operations, maintenance, and administration). Both years administration had the highest mean score and operations had the lowest mean score. The authors attributed the statistically significant differences found among the three major divisions to various dissimilarities in their work environments.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2009.01.007
发表时间: 2009-08-01
期刊: SAFETY SCIENCE
影响因子: 6.1
作者:
Ma, Qingguo;Yuan, Jingpeng
通讯作者: Yuan, Jingpeng
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.02.006
发表时间: 2007-11-01
影响因子: 5.9
作者:
Huang, Yueng-Hsiang;Chen, Jiu-Chiuan;Chen, Peter Y.
通讯作者: Chen, Peter Y.
DOI: 10.1007/s42461-020-00207-8
发表时间: 2020-03-27
影响因子: 1.9
作者:
Jiskani, Izhar Mithal;Cai, Qingxiang;Lu, Xiang
通讯作者: Lu, Xiang
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2003.05.004
发表时间: 2003-01-01
影响因子: 4.1
作者:
Kowalski-Trakofler, KM;Barrett, EA
通讯作者: Barrett, EA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2016.03.002
发表时间: 2016-06-01
影响因子: 4.1
作者:
Jiang, Lixin;Probst, Tahira M.
通讯作者: Probst, Tahira M.