Adolescent-Parent conflict in Hong Kong and Shenzhen: A comparison of youth in two cultural contexts
Adolescent-Parent conflict in Hong Kong and Shenzhen: A comparison of youth in two cultural contexts
复制标题
香港和深圳的青少年与父母冲突：两种文化背景下青少年的比较
DOI：
10.1080/01650250244000209
复制
发表时间：
2003
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
J. Smetana
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jenny Y. P. Yau;J. Smetana
本研究调查了188名5年级、7年级、10年级和12年级的中国青少年，其中93名来自香港，95名来自中国深圳。个别受访的中国青少年报告称，他们与父母在日常问题上存在分歧，主要是活动选择、功课、人际关系和家务。冲突在数量上相对较少，在频率上是中等的，在强度上是温和的，并且在青春期早期(5年级和7年级)比青春期晚期(12年级)更激烈。香港在家务和人际关系方面的冲突比深圳多，深圳在学业上的冲突比香港多，尤其是在7年级和12年级学生中。正如预期的那样，青少年主要通过诉诸个人管辖权来为冲突辩护，特别是在活动和家庭作业选择上的冲突，并且在不同背景下，个人推理随着年龄的增长而增加。冲突主要是通过向父母让步来解决的，尽管青少年希望在决策方面拥有比他们声称拥有的更多的自主权。尽管中国青少年之间的父母冲突似乎反映了青少年自主性的发展，但特定的文化过程会影响其表达。
This study examined adolescent–parent conflict among 188 5th-, 7th-, 10th-, and 12th-grade Chinese adolescents, 93 from Hong Kong and 95 from Shenzhen, PRC. Individually interviewed Chinese adolescents reported disagreements with parents over everyday issues, primarily choice of activities, schoolwork, interpersonal relationships, and chores. Conflicts were relatively few in number, moderate in frequency, and mild in intensity, and across contexts, conflicts were more intense in early adolescence (5th and 7th grades) than in late adolescence (12th grade). There were more conflicts over chores and interpersonal relationships in Hong Kong than in Shenzhen and more conflicts over schoolwork in Shenzhen than in Hong Kong, particularly among 7th and 12th graders. As expected, adolescents primarily justified conflicts, particularly conflicts over choice of activities and homework, by appealing to personal jurisdiction, and across contexts, personal reasoning increased with age. Conflicts were resolved primarily by giving in to parents, although adolescents desired more autonomy in decision making than they reported having. Although adolescent–parent conflict among Chinese youth appears to reflect the development of adolescent autonomy, culturally specific processes influence its expression.
青少年和父母对实际家庭冲突的推理。
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Smetana,JG
通讯作者：
Smetana,JG
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
B. Laursen;K. Coy;W. Collins
通讯作者：
B. Laursen;K. Coy;W. Collins