Psychometrically improved, abbreviated versions of three classic measures of impulsivity and self-control.

Psychometrically improved, abbreviated versions of three classic measures of impulsivity and self-control.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/pas0000003
复制
发表时间:
2014-09
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
O'Malley, Stephanie S.
O'Malley, Stephanie S.
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Morean, Meghan E.;DeMartini, Kelly S.;Leeman, Robert F.;Pearlson, Godfrey D.;Anticevic, Alan;Krishnan-Sarin, Suchitra;Krystal, John H.;O'Malley, Stephanie S.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

自我报告的冲动赋予药物滥用的危险因素。然而,许多自我报告冲动性措施的心理测量特性受到质疑,从而破坏了使用这些措施的研究结果的可解释性。为了更好地理解这些测量的局限性,并提出一种评估自我报告的冲动性的方法,具有更大的心理测量稳定性,我们使用来自1,449名参与物质使用研究的个体的数据,对Barratt冲动量表-11(BIS-11),行为抑制和激活量表(BIS/BAS)和简要自我控制量表(BSCS)进行了全面的心理测量评估。对于每一项措施,我们评估:1)潜在的因素结构,2)测量不变性,3)测试标准之间的关系的措施,和4)测试标准与饮酒和吸烟的结果。值得注意的是,我们无法复制BIS、BIS/BAS或BSCS或任何先前发表的替代因子结构(英语)的原始潜在结构。使用探索性和验证性因素分析,我们确定了心理测量学上的改善,每个措施的缩写版本(即,8项,2因子BIS-11 [RMSEA = .06,CFI = .95]; 13项,4因子BIS/BAS [RMSEA = .04,CFI = .96]; 7项,2因子BSCS [RMSEA = .05,CFI = .96])。这些版本证明:1)稳定的、可复制的因子结构,2)标量测量不变性,确保我们能够在感兴趣的子组之间进行统计上可解释的比较(例如,性别、种族、饮酒/吸烟状况),以及3)彼此之间以及与饮酒/吸烟之间的测试标准关系。这项研究提供了强有力的支持,使用这些心理测量改善冲动的措施,提高数据质量直接通过更好的规模属性和间接通过减少响应负担。
Self-reported impulsivity confers risk factor for substance abuse. However, the psychometric properties of many self-report impulsivity measures have been questioned, thereby undermining the interpretability of study findings using these measures. To better understand these measurement limitations and to suggest a path to assessing self-reported impulsivity with greater psychometric stability, we conducted a comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11), the Behavioral Inhibition and Activation Scales (BIS/BAS), and the Brief Self Control Scale (BSCS) using data from 1,449 individuals who participated in substance use research. For each measure, we evaluated: 1) latent factor structure, 2) measurement invariance, 3) test-criterion relationships between the measures, and 4) test-criterion relations with drinking and smoking outcomes. Notably, we could not replicate the originally published latent structure for the BIS, BIS/BAS, or BSCS or any previously published alternative factor structures (English language). Using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, we identified psychometrically improved, abbreviated versions of each measure (i.e., 8-item, 2 factor BIS-11 [RMSEA = .06, CFI = .95]; 13-item, 4 factor BIS/BAS [RMSEA = .04, CFI = .96]; 7-item, 2 factor BSCS [RMSEA = .05, CFI = .96]). These versions evidenced: 1) stable, replicable factor structures, 2) scalar measurement invariance, ensuring our ability to make statistically interpretable comparisons across subgroups of interest (e.g., sex, race, drinking/smoking status), and 3) test-criterion relationships with each other and with drinking/smoking. This study provides strong support for using these psychometrically improved impulsivity measures, which improve data quality directly through better scale properties and indirectly through reducing response burden.
DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118
发表时间: 1999-01-01
影响因子: 6
作者:
Hu, Li-tze;Bentler, Peter M.
通讯作者: Bentler, Peter M.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2009.00190.x
发表时间: 2010-04
期刊: Addiction biology
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
Dick DM;Smith G;Olausson P;Mitchell SH;Leeman RF;O'Malley SS;Sher K
通讯作者: Sher K
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.198
发表时间: 2006-02-01
影响因子: 4.9
作者:
Duckworth, AL;Seligman, MEP
通讯作者: Seligman, MEP
DOI: 10.1080/10705510701301834
发表时间: 2005-01-01
影响因子: 6
作者:
Chen, FF;Sousa, KH;West, SG
通讯作者: West, SG
DOI: 10.1037/a0021591
发表时间: 2011-01-01
影响因子: 22.4
作者:
Cross, Catharine P.;Copping, Lee T.;Campbell, Anne
通讯作者: Campbell, Anne