Multipathway multi-echo (MPME) imaging: all main MR parameters mapped based on a single 3D scan.

Multipathway multi-echo (MPME) imaging: all main MR parameters mapped based on a single 3D scan.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1002/mrm.27525
复制
发表时间:
2019-03
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Madore B
Madore B
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cheng CC;Preiswerk F;Hoge WS;Kuo TH;Madore B

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

与定性灰度图像相反,定量参数图可能代表诊断MRI的未来。这里介绍了一种新的定量MRI方法,该方法需要单次3D采集,允许在相对较短的扫描时间内实现良好的空间覆盖。开发了多通道多回波(MPME)序列,至少需要三个通道和两个回波时间来生成T1、T2、T2*、B1+和B 0图。该方法需要对中心k空间区域进行两次采样,使用相同的序列,但使用两个非常不同的标称翻转角设置。因此,扫描时间仅比单次扫描稍长。MPME数据被重建成参数图,幻影以及大脑收购,在5名健康志愿者在3 T。空间分辨率为1.2×1.0× 1.2mm ~ 3,矩阵尺寸为160×192×160,全脑视野为19.2 × 19.2 × 19.2cm ~ 3,采集时间为11.5min。根据梯度回波和自旋回波数据计算的T1、T2和T2* 图进行验证。在Bland-Altman图中,体内和体模中T1和T2结果的偏倚和一致性限值分别为:−2.9/±125.5ms(体内T1)、−4.8/±20.8ms(体内T2)、−1.5/±18.1ms(体模中T1)和−5.3/±7.4ms(体模中T2),ROI包括给定的脑结构或体模隔室。由于相对高的噪声水平,该方法的当前实现可能证明对于基于ROI的解释比基于像素的解释更有用。我们提出了一种新的方法来定量映射MR参数的MPME采集的基础上。
Quantitative parameter maps, as opposed to qualitative grayscale images, may represent the future of diagnostic MRI. A new quantitative MRI method is introduced here that requires a single 3D acquisition, allowing good spatial coverage to be achieved in relatively short scan times. A multi-pathway multi-echo (MPME) sequence was developed, and at least three pathways with two echo times were needed to generate T1, T2, T2*, B1+ and B0 maps. The method required the central k-space region to be sampled twice, with the same sequence but with two very different nominal flip angle settings. Consequently, scan time was only slightly longer than that of a single scan. MPME data were reconstructed into parameter maps, for phantom as well as brain acquisitions, in five healthy volunteers at 3T. Spatial resolution, matrix size and FOV were 1.2×1.0×1.2mm3, 160×192×160 and 19.2×19.2×19.2cm3 (whole brain), acquired in 11.5 min with minimal acceleration. Validation was performed against T1, T2 and T2* maps calculated from gradient-echo and spin-echo data. In Bland-Altman plots, bias and limits of agreement for T1 and T2 results in vivo and in phantom were: −2.9/±125.5ms (T1 in vivo), −4.8/±20.8ms (T2 in vivo), −1.5/±18.1ms (T1 in phantom), and −5.3/±7.4ms (T2 in phantom), for ROIs including given brain structures or phantom compartments. Due to relatively-high noise levels, the current implementation of the approach may prove more useful for ROI-based as opposed to pixel-based interpretation. We proposed a novel approach to quantitatively map MR parameters based on an MPME acquisition.
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23199
发表时间: 2012-07-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Hurley, Samuel A.;Yarnykh, Vasily L.;Samsonov, Alexey A.
通讯作者: Samsonov, Alexey A.
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21849
发表时间: 2009-08-01
影响因子: 4.4
作者:
Deoni, Sean C. L.
通讯作者: Deoni, Sean C. L.
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910070105
发表时间: 1988-05-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
BRUDER, H;FISCHER, H;DEIMLING, M
通讯作者: DEIMLING, M
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21704
发表时间: 2008-12-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Deoni, Sean C. L.;Rutt, Brian K.;Jones, Derek K.
通讯作者: Jones, Derek K.
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23275
发表时间: 2012-09-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Bieri, Oliver;Ganter, Carl;Scheffler, Klaus
通讯作者: Scheffler, Klaus