Why should we promote public engagement with science?

Why should we promote public engagement with science?
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/0963662513518154
复制
发表时间:
2014-01
期刊:
Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Wilsdon J
Wilsdon J
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Stilgoe J;Lock SJ;Wilsdon J

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

这篇介绍性文章回顾了《公众对科学的理解》杂志创刊以来的二十年。借鉴本期特邀评论,我们可以看到围绕公众参与科学的实践和政治的连续性和变化的叙述。公众参与似乎是开放科学及其治理的必要但不充分的部分。我们这些参与倡导、实施和评估公众参与实践的人可能会被指责过度承诺。如果我们作为社会科学家要继续对公众参与理念做出规范性承诺,那么我们就应该发展新的论证和分析思路。我们对公众参与理念的支持需要进行限定,作为对公众参与科学理念更广泛、更雄心勃勃的兴趣的一部分。
This introductory essay looks back on the two decades since the journal Public Understanding of Science was launched. Drawing on the invited commentaries in this special issue, we can see narratives of continuity and change around the practice and politics of public engagement with science. Public engagement would seem to be a necessary but insufficient part of opening up science and its governance. Those of us who have been involved in advocating, conducting and evaluating public engagement practice could be accused of over-promising. If we, as social scientists, are going to continue a normative commitment to the idea of public engagement, we should therefore develop new lines of argument and analysis. Our support for the idea of public engagement needs qualifying, as part of a broader, more ambitious interest in the idea of publicly engaged science.
DOI: 10.1177/030631288018004006
发表时间: 1988-11-01
影响因子: 3
作者:
COLLINS, HM
通讯作者: COLLINS, HM
DOI: 10.1177/0963662507079760
发表时间: 2009-05-01
影响因子: 4.1
作者:
Davies, Sarah;McCallie, Ellen;Duensing, Sally
通讯作者: Duensing, Sally
DOI: 10.1177/0963662510365663
发表时间: 2012-01-01
影响因子: 4.1
作者:
Barnett, Julie;Burningham, Kate;Cass, Noel
通讯作者: Cass, Noel
DOI: 10.1177/1075547008316222
发表时间: 2008-06-01
影响因子: 9
作者:
Davies, Sarah R.
通讯作者: Davies, Sarah R.
DOI: 10.1177/0032329206288152
发表时间: 2006-06-01
期刊: POLITICS & SOCIETY
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Goodin, Robert E.;Dryzek, John S.
通讯作者: Dryzek, John S.