What matters, when, for whom? three questions to guide population health scholarship.
What matters, when, for whom? three questions to guide population health scholarship.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1136/injuryprev-2017-042415
复制
发表时间：
2018-06
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Keyes KM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Galea S;Keyes KM
我们正处于公共卫生学术史的转折点。在过去十年中，越来越多地采用人口健康作为一个概念透镜，作为公共卫生实践的基础科学。[1]伴随着这种兴趣的增长，出现了一些书籍和论文，这些书籍和论文都渴望建立指导人口健康科学研究的框架。我们认为这一切都是积极的，将人口健康科学的兴起视为自由，允许人口健康学术的发展，这种学术可以与思想接触，不受公共卫生实践的实用需求的阻碍。人口健康领域学术研究的增长可能与公共卫生实践的差距太大。摆脱务实的紧迫性有可能导致学术脱离公共卫生事业的需要。在这篇文章中，我们的目标是回顾我们自己的一些关于人口健康科学的学术研究，4-6由在我们之前7或目前正在该领域写作的其他人提供信息，8以突出我们认为可以帮助关注当代人口健康科学的三个核心问题。我们认为，这三个问题出现从人口健康的基本面的理解，但可以，也许应该，作为路标新兴的奖学金。我们用与伤害预防相关的例子来说明这些问题的重要性，目的是使我们的思想具体化，并使这些问题挑战和激发这一领域的学术和行动。
We are at an inflection point in the history of public health scholarship. The past decade has seen a steady increase in the adoption of population health as a conceptual lens, emerging as the science that underlies the practice of public health. 1 Attending this increase in interest have been books 2 and papers 3 that aspire to create frameworks that guide the study of population health science. We consider this all positive, seeing the rise of population health science as freeing, allowing the evolution of a scholarship of population health that can engage with ideas, unencumbered by the pragmatic needs of public health practice.As might be expected, however, this evolution also occasions challenges. The growth of scholarship in population health may diverge too widely from the practice of public health. Freedom from pragmatic exigency runs the risk of leading to scholarship that is unmoored from the needs of the public health enterprise. In this essay, we aim to distil some of our own scholarship around population health science, 4–6 informed by others who have come before us 7 or are currently writing in the field, 8 to highlight three core questions that we think can help focus contemporary population health science. We argue that the three questions emerge from an understanding of the fundamentals of population health but can, and perhaps should, serve as guideposts for emerging scholarship. We illustrate the import of each of these questions with examples of relevance to injury prevention, aiming both to concretise our thoughts and to have these questions challenge and provoke scholarship and action in this area.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
12.7
作者：
Fleetwood, Janet
通讯作者：
Fleetwood, Janet
影响因子：
10.6
作者：
Roberts, Andrea L.;Galea, Sandro;Koenen, Karestan C.
通讯作者：
Koenen, Karestan C.
影响因子：
5.6
作者：
Keyes, Katherine;Galea, Sandro
通讯作者：
Galea, Sandro
影响因子：
12.7
作者：
Kindig, D;Stoddart, G
通讯作者：
Stoddart, G
影响因子：
26.1
作者：
Kerr, Zachary Y.;Zuckerman, Scott L.;Dompier, Thomas P.
通讯作者：
Dompier, Thomas P.