Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in diffusion-weighted mr imaging in breast cancer: comparison with single-shot echo-planar imaging in image quality.
Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in diffusion-weighted mr imaging in breast cancer: comparison with single-shot echo-planar imaging in image quality.
复制标题
DOI:
10.3348/kjr.2014.15.4.403
复制
发表时间:
2014-07
影响因子:
4.8
通讯作者:
Song BJ
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kim YJ;Kim SH;Kang BJ;Park CS;Kim HS;Son YH;Porter DA;Song BJ
The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality of standard single-shot echo-planar imaging (ss-EPI) and that of readout-segmented EPI (rs-EPI) in patients with breast cancer. Seventy-one patients with 74 breast cancers underwent both ss-EPI and rs-EPI. For qualitative comparison of image quality, three readers independently assessed the two sets of diffusion-weighted (DW) images. To evaluate geometric distortion, a comparison was made between lesion lengths derived from contrast enhanced MR (CE-MR) images and those obtained from the corresponding DW images. For assessment of image parameters, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), lesion contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. The rs-EPI was superior to ss-EPI in most criteria regarding the qualitative image quality. Anatomical structure distinction, delineation of the lesion, ghosting artifact, and overall image quality were significantly better in rs-EPI. Regarding the geometric distortion, lesion length on ss-EPI was significantly different from that of CE-MR, whereas there were no significant differences between CE-MR and rs-EPI. The rs-EPI was superior to ss-EPI in SNR and CNR. Readout-segmented EPI is superior to ss-EPI in the aspect of image quality in DW MR imaging of the breast.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.3174/ajnr.a2481
发表时间:
2011-08
期刊:
AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology
影响因子:
--
作者:
Holdsworth SJ;Yeom K;Skare S;Gentles AJ;Barnes PD;Bammer R
通讯作者:
Bammer R
影响因子:
120.7
作者:
Bluemke, DA;Gatsonis, CA;Schnall, MD
通讯作者:
Schnall, MD
影响因子:
1.3
作者:
Morelli, John;Porter, David;Runge, Val
通讯作者:
Runge, Val
影响因子:
19.7
作者:
Bogner, Wolfgang;Pinker-Domenig, Katja;Gruber, Stephan
通讯作者:
Gruber, Stephan
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Miller, KL;Pauly, JM
通讯作者:
Pauly, JM