Identity profiles in lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth: the role of family influences.
Identity profiles in lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth: the role of family influences.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10964-012-9798-z
复制
发表时间：
2013-03
影响因子：
4.9
通讯作者：
Lindahl, Kristin M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bregman, Hallie R.;Malik, Neena M.;Page, Matthew J. L.;Makynen, Emily;Lindahl, Kristin M.
性身份发展是青春期和青年期的一项中心任务，对性少数青年来说尤其具有挑战性。最近的研究已经从一个阶段模型的身份发展在女同性恋，男同性恋和双性恋（LGB）青年检查身份在一个非线性的，多维的方式。此外，虽然家庭被认为对青年的身份发展很重要，但有限的研究审查了父母对青年披露其LGB性取向的反应对LGB身份的影响。本研究探讨了LGB身份的多维模型及其与父母支持和拒绝的联系。169名LGB青少年和年轻人（年龄14-24岁，56%为男性，48%为同性恋，31%为女同性恋，21%为双性恋）在LGB身份的维度上描述了自己，并报告了父母的拒绝，性取向特定的社会支持和非性取向特定的社会支持。使用潜在的配置文件分析（LPA），两个配置文件被确定，表明青年的经验，肯定和挣扎的身份。结果表明，父母的拒绝和性别特异性的社会支持的家庭是显着的链接到LGB的身份档案分类，而非性别特异性的社会支持是无关的。父母的拒绝和针对性取向的社会支持可能是家庭干预措施的重要目标，以促进青年人肯定的LGB身份发展。
Sexual identity development is a central task of adolescence and young adulthood and can be especially challenging for sexual minority youth. Recent research has moved from a stage model of identity development in lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) youth to examining identity in a non-linear, multidimensional manner. In addition, although families have been identified as important to youth's identity development, limited research has examined the influence of parental responses to youth's disclosure of their LGB sexual orientation on LGB identity. The current study examined a multidimensional model of LGB identity and its links with parental support and rejection. One hundred and sixty-nine LGB adolescents and young adults (ages 14–24, 56% male, 48% gay, 31% lesbian, 21% bisexual) described themselves on dimensions of LGB identity and reported on parental rejection, sexuality-specific social support, and non-sexuality-specific social support. Using latent profile analysis (LPA), two profiles were identified, indicating that youth experience both affirmed and struggling identities. Results indicated that parental rejection and sexuality-specific social support from families were salient links to LGB identity profile classification, while non-sexuality specific social support was unrelated. Parental rejection and sexuality-specific social support may be important to target in interventions for families to foster affirmed LGB identity development in youth.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
MARCIA, JE
通讯作者：
MARCIA, JE
影响因子：
4.9
作者：
Floyd, FJ;Stein, TS;Nye, CL
通讯作者：
Nye, CL
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Branje, SJT;van Aken, MAG;van Lieshout, CFM
通讯作者：
van Lieshout, CFM
DOI：
10.1080/15283480802579409
发表时间：
2009-01-01
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Archer, Sally L.;Grey, Jeremy A.
通讯作者：
Grey, Jeremy A.
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
DAUGELLI, AR;HERSHBERGER, SL
通讯作者：
HERSHBERGER, SL