Reconstructing the expression of placement events in Danish as a second language.
Reconstructing the expression of placement events in Danish as a second language.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.922682
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Hijazo-Gascon, Alberto
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cadierno, Teresa;Ibarretxe-Antunano, Iraide;Hijazo-Gascon, Alberto
关键词：
事件类型学的跨语言研究表明，安置事件的语言概念化存在很大差异。前人对二语习得的研究主要集中在对第二语言中位置动词的语义重新分类上，而对位置结构的研究较少。本研究通过考察母语为西班牙语的丹麦语学习者(B1级和B2级)和两种语言的单语者所使用的句式来填补这一空白。通过由口述视频描述组成的PUT任务获取数据，然后根据其频率和结构将其分为六个主要的位置结构类别。来自学习者组的结果表明，在第二语言丹麦语中重建安置事件的表达时存在学习困难。与第一语言丹麦语数据相比，学习者(I)更频繁地使用母语西班牙语基本位置结构，(Ii)避免语义上更复杂的结构，(Iii)使用较少的空间助词，(Iv)在选择特定位置场景的合适空间助词方面存在困难，以及(V)使用非致使运动结构。这些发现表明学习者创造了一种不同于L1和L2单语模式的语言概念化模式，从而为双语者的多种能力不等同于两个单语者的观点提供了进一步的经验支持。
Cross-linguistic research on event typology has revealed considerable variation in the linguistic conceptualization of placement events. Previous studies on second language acquisition have primarily dealt with the semantic re-categorization of placement verbs in a second language, but placement constructions have received less attention. The present study fills this gap by examining the constructions used by Spanish learners of L2 Danish (B1 and B2 levels) and by monolingual speakers of both languages. Data were elicited by means of the PUT task consisting of oral video descriptions and then classified into six main placement construction categories based on their frequency and structure. Results from the learner group suggest learning difficulties when reconstructing the expression of placement events in L2 Danish. In contrast to L1 Danish data, learners (i) kept using their L1 Spanish basic placement construction more often, (ii) avoided semantically more complex constructions, (iii) employed fewer spatial particles, (iv) showed difficulties in selecting the L2 appropriate spatial particles for specific placement scenes, and (v) used non-caused motion constructions. These findings suggest the creation of a linguistic conceptualization pattern on the part of the learners that is different from the respective L1 and L2 monolingual patterns, thus providing further empirical support for proposals arguing that bilinguals’ multicompetence is not equivalent to those of two monolinguals.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Brown, Amanda;Gullberg, Marianne
通讯作者：
Gullberg, Marianne
影响因子：
1.7
作者：
Gullberg, Marianne;Narasimhan, Bhuvana
通讯作者：
Narasimhan, Bhuvana
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
Alferink, Inge;Gullberg, Marianne
通讯作者：
Gullberg, Marianne
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
Cadierno, Teresa;Ibarretxe-Antunano, Iraide;Hijazo-Gascon, Alberto
通讯作者：
Hijazo-Gascon, Alberto
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
CHOI, S;BOWERMAN, M
通讯作者：
BOWERMAN, M