Young adult e-cigarette use: A latent class analysis of device and flavor use, 2018-2019.
Young adult e-cigarette use: A latent class analysis of device and flavor use, 2018-2019.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108258
复制
发表时间：
2020-11-01
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
Barrington-Trimis JL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lanza HI;Leventhal AM;Cho J;Braymiller JL;Krueger EA;McConnell R;Barrington-Trimis JL
年轻人（YAs）使用的无数电子烟设备和口味使识别与更频繁的烟草使用相关的特定电子烟产品变得复杂，值得考虑进行监管。目前的研究使用潜在类别分析来识别电子烟设备和香料使用的不同模式，并评估它们与电子烟和吸烟频率的关联。分析了来自南加州队列的横断面调查数据（2018-2019年）。报告过去30天尼古丁蒸汽烟的YA（N = 550; M年龄= 19.2岁）自我报告电子烟装置类型/品牌和口味。潜在类别分析中包括六种设备（电子烟/电子烟笔、机械mod、盒子mod、JUUL、非JUUL pod、一次性）和三种风味（烟草、薄荷/薄荷醇、甜味/水果）指标。过去30天的尼古丁电子烟和吸烟频率被评估为设备和风味类别成员的相关性。确定了三个类别：任何豆荚薄荷/薄荷或甜/水果口味的用户（患病率：47%）;非Juul-甜/水果口味的用户（28%）;和多设备-多口味的用户（25%）。vaping和吸烟的频率越高，属于多设备多口味用户类别的几率越高，而任何豆荚薄荷/薄荷或甜/水果口味用户（电子烟：aOR[95%CI] = 1.36[1.16，1.59]，p < .001;吸烟：aOR[95%CI] = 1.25[1.02，1.54]，p = .03）和非Juul-甜味/水果味使用者（电子烟：aOR [95%CI] = 1.30[1.10，1.53]，p < .01;吸烟：aOR[95%CI] = 1.42[1.07，1.88]，p = .02）类。虽然主要使用豆荚装置和非烟草香料的YAs是最常见的，但以倾向于使用许多不同装置和香料为特征的YAs相当普遍，并且更频繁地吸烟和吸电子烟。针对各种电子烟产品的法规可能是保护YA健康的最佳选择。
The myriad of e-cigarette devices and flavors used by young adults (YAs) complicates identification of the particular e-cigarette products that are associated with more frequent tobacco use and merit consideration for regulation. The current study used latent class analysis to identify distinct patterns of e-cigarette device and flavor use and evaluate their association with vaping and smoking frequency. Cross-sectional survey data (2018–2019) from a Southern California cohort were analyzed. YAs reporting past 30-day nicotine vaping (N = 550; M age = 19.2 years) self-reported e-cigarette device type/brand and flavor. Six device (e-cig/vape pen, mech mod, box mod, JUUL, non-JUUL pod, disposable) and three flavor (tobacco, mint/menthol, sweet/fruit) indicators were included in a latent class analysis. Past 30-day nicotine vaping and cigarette smoking frequency were assessed as correlates of device and flavor class membership. Three classes were identified: Any Pod–Mint/Menthol or Sweet/Fruit Flavor Users (prevalance:47%); Non-JUUL–Sweet/Fruit Flavor Users (28%); and Poly-Device–Poly-Flavor Users (25%). Greater frequency of vaping and smoking were associated with higher odds of belonging to the Poly-Device–Poly-Flavor Users class vs. the Any Pod–Mint/Menthol or Sweet/Fruit Flavor Users (vaping: aOR[95%CI] = 1.36[1.16, 1.59], p < .001; smoking: aOR[95%CI] = 1.25[1.02, 1.54], p = .03) and Non-JUUL–Sweet/Fruit Flavor Users (vaping: aOR [95%CI] = 1.30[1.10, 1.53], p < .01; smoking: aOR[95%CI] = 1.42[1.07, 1.88], p = .02) classes. Although YAs that predominately used pod devices alongside non-tobacco flavors were most common, YAs characterized by a proclivity toward using many different devices and flavors were appreciably prevalent and smoked and vaped more frequently. Regulations targeting a wide spectrum of vaping products may be optimal in protecting YA health.
登录
查看更多内容
电子香烟尼古丁浓度与随后的香烟吸烟和青少年烟的关联。
影响因子：
26.1
作者：
Goldenson NI;Leventhal AM;Stone MD;McConnell RS;Barrington-Trimis JL
通讯作者：
Barrington-Trimis JL
影响因子：
8
作者：
Dai, Hongying;Hao, Jianqiang
通讯作者：
Hao, Jianqiang
影响因子：
5.2
作者：
Huang J;Duan Z;Kwok J;Binns S;Vera LE;Kim Y;Szczypka G;Emery SL
通讯作者：
Emery SL
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Chen, Julia Cen;Green, Kerry;Borzekowski, Dina
通讯作者：
Borzekowski, Dina
影响因子：
8
作者：
Leventhal, Adam M.;Goldenson, Nicholas, I;Barrington-Trimis, Jessica L.
通讯作者：
Barrington-Trimis, Jessica L.