The significance of context for the emergence and implementation of research evidence: the case of collaborative problem-solving
The significance of context for the emergence and implementation of research evidence: the case of collaborative problem-solving
复制标题
背景对于研究证据的出现和实施的重要性:协作解决问题的案例
DOI:
10.1080/03054985.2017.1389713
复制
发表时间:
2017
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
Cukurova M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cukurova M
One of the fundamental purposes of educational research is to provide evidence to facilitate effective practice. However, the evidence itself does not have much value for practitioners unless key information about the context from which the evidence was generated is also provided. In this paper, we use the word ‘context’ to refer to factors that are relevant for learning, including the interactions that learners experience with multiple people, artefacts, and environments. Unfortunately, in many educational research studies, either these factors do not get the required attention or information about them is presented in an incoherent structure. The resultant lack of information leads to two significant drawbacks. First, it creates confusion among practitioners who want to apply research evidence in their practice. Second, it leads to research studies that on the face of it are similar, but that in reality have resulted from evidence that has been collected in significantly different contexts being included under the same categories in reviews, meta-reviews, and best-evidence syntheses. In this paper, we draw on the concept of ‘relatability’ of evidence and present taxonomy for collaborative problem-solving (CPS) that can be used to provide the valuable information against which research evidence can be indexed. By addressing the need for more detailed information about the contextual factors from which the evidence is generated to bridge the gap between research and practice in CPS research, we aim to exemplify the approach that is needed in educational research more generally.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
I. Rasmussen;Å. M. Hagen
通讯作者:
Å. M. Hagen
影响因子:
11.7
作者:
E. Kyndt;E. Raes;Bart Lismont;Fran Timmers;Eduardo C. Cascallar;F. Dochy
通讯作者:
E. Kyndt;E. Raes;Bart Lismont;Fran Timmers;Eduardo C. Cascallar;F. Dochy
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
Geoffrey Petty
通讯作者:
Geoffrey Petty
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
R. Luckin;E. Baines;M. Cukurova;Wayne Holmes;Michael Mann
通讯作者:
Michael Mann
影响因子:
1.3
作者:
F. S. Breed
通讯作者:
F. S. Breed