Attention to the COVID‐19 Pandemic on Twitter: Partisan Differences Among U.S. State Legislators

Attention to the COVID‐19 Pandemic on Twitter: Partisan Differences Among U.S. State Legislators
复制标题

Twitter 上对 COVID-19 大流行的关注:美国各州立法者之间的党派分歧

DOI:
10.1111/lsq.12367
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
1.5
通讯作者:
Boehmke, Frederick J.
Boehmke, Frederick J.
中科院分区:
法学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kim, Taegyoon;Nakka, Nitheesha;Gopal, Ishita;Desmarais, Bruce A.;Mancinelli, Abigail;Harden, Jeffrey J.;Ko, Hyein;Boehmke, Frederick J.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

美国地方政府在应对COVID-19疫情的多个方面发挥了领导作用。各州政府活动的差异提供了在可比环境中分析反应的机会。我们研究了州政府官员中一个常见的信息活动--州立法者在Twitter上对疫情的关注。我们发现,立法者对大流行的关注与立法者所在州的病例数、全国新增死亡人数以及立法者所在州通过的与大流行相关的公共政策数量密切相关。此外,我们发现,不同政党对流行病指标的反应程度存在显著差异,平均而言,共和党人的反应较弱。最后,我们发现民主党和共和党立法者关于大流行病的推文内容存在显著差异,民主党人关注健康指标和影响,共和党人关注商业影响和开放经济。
Subnational governments in the United States have taken the lead on many aspects of the response to the COVID‐19 pandemic. Variation in government activity across states offers the opportunity to analyze responses in comparable settings. We study a common and informative activity among state officials—state legislators’ attention to the pandemic on Twitter. We find that legislators’ attention to the pandemic strongly correlates with the number of cases in the legislator’s state, the national count of new deaths, and the number of pandemic‐related public policies passed within the legislator’s state. Furthermore, we find that the degree of responsiveness to pandemic indicators differs significantly across political parties, with Republicans exhibiting weaker responses, on average. Lastly, we find significant differences in the content of tweets about the pandemic by Democratic and Republican legislators, with Democrats focused on health indicators and impacts, and Republicans focused on business impacts and opening the economy.
比较政治学中的面板数据分析:方法与理论的联系
DOI: --
发表时间: 2005
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Thomas Plümper;Vera E. Troeger;P. Manow
通讯作者: P. Manow
全球教育政策网络的兴起:使用社交网络分析分析 Twitter 关于全纳教育的辩论
DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2019.1664768
发表时间: 2019
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
J. Schuster;Helge Jörgens;N. Kolleck
通讯作者: N. Kolleck
DOI: 10.1111/lsq.12232
发表时间: 2019
影响因子: 1.5
作者:
Michael J. Barber;Alexander Bolton;Sharece Thrower
通讯作者: Sharece Thrower
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.91.062809
发表时间: 2015-05
期刊: Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics
影响因子: --
作者:
Gordon J. Ross;Tim Jones
通讯作者: Gordon J. Ross;Tim Jones
推特上的参议院代表:选民沟通的国家政策声誉
DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12904
发表时间: 2020
影响因子: 1.9
作者:
A. Russell
通讯作者: A. Russell