Content Validation of a Chrononutrition Questionnaire for the General and Shift Work Populations: A Delphi Study.
Content Validation of a Chrononutrition Questionnaire for the General and Shift Work Populations: A Delphi Study.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3390/nu13114087
复制
发表时间：
2021-11-15
期刊：
影响因子：
5.9
通讯作者：
Coates AM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Phoi YY;Bonham MP;Rogers M;Dorrian J;Coates AM
不寻常的进餐时间与慢性病的高患病率有关。轮班工人和晚睡型的人风险更高。本研究旨在验证轮班和非轮班工人时间营养问卷的内容，以确定与时间型相关的进食时间模式。内容效度采用三轮德尔菲研究确定。专家们对7个结果中的46个项目的相关性进行了评级，并提供了反馈：吃饭规律、第一次吃饭的时间、最后一次吃饭的时间、最丰盛的一餐、主餐/零食、醒来和睡眠，这些都是在回应中编辑的。具有大于70%的相关性共识的项目被接受。第一、第二和第三轮分别有28名、26名和24名专家。在三轮中，没有结果是不相关的，但为了便于使用，七个结果合并为三个，并增加了两个部分供专家评分和评论。在最后一轮中，29个项目中除一个项目外，其余项目均获得了超过70%的相关性共识，没有进一步的变化。时间营养问卷被认为与昼夜生物学和时间营养专家相关，并且可以代表未来研究中评估与时间型相关的饮食时间模式的方便工具。
Unusual meal timing has been associated with a higher prevalence of chronic disease. Those at greater risk include shift workers and evening chronotypes. This study aimed to validate the content of a Chrononutrition Questionnaire for shift and non-shift workers to identify temporal patterns of eating in relation to chronotype. Content validity was determined using a Delphi study of three rounds. Experts rated the relevance of, and provided feedback on, 46 items across seven outcomes: meal regularity, times of first eating occasion, last eating occasion, largest meal, main meals/snacks, wake, and sleep, which were edited in response. Items with greater than 70% consensus of relevance were accepted. Rounds one, two, and three had 28, 26, and 24 experts, respectively. Across three rounds, no outcomes were irrelevant, but seven were merged into three for ease of usage, and two sections were added for experts to rate and comment on. In the final round, all but one of 29 items achieved greater than 70% consensus of relevance with no further changes. The Chrononutrition Questionnaire was deemed relevant to experts in circadian biology and chrononutrition, and could represent a convenient tool to assess temporal patterns of eating in relation to chronotype in future studies.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
de Assis, MAA;Kupek, E;Bellisle, F
通讯作者：
Bellisle, F
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Hasson, F;Keeney, S;McKenna, H
通讯作者：
McKenna, H
DOI：
10.1056/nejmra1802337
发表时间：
2021-02-11
期刊：
The New England journal of medicine
影响因子：
--
作者：
Allada R;Bass J
通讯作者：
Bass J
影响因子：
8.2
作者：
Jakubowicz, Daniela;Wainstein, Julio;Froy, Oren
通讯作者：
Froy, Oren
DOI：
10.3109/09540261.2014.911149
发表时间：
2014-04
期刊：
International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England)
影响因子：
--
作者：
Baron KG;Reid KJ
通讯作者：
Reid KJ