Effectiveness of CoronaVac among healthcare workers in the setting of high SARS-CoV-2 Gamma variant transmission in Manaus, Brazil: A test-negative case-control study.
Effectiveness of CoronaVac among healthcare workers in the setting of high SARS-CoV-2 Gamma variant transmission in Manaus, Brazil: A test-negative case-control study.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.lana.2021.100025
复制
发表时间:
2021-09
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Croda J
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hitchings MDT;Ranzani OT;Torres MSS;de Oliveira SB;Almiron M;Said R;Borg R;Schulz WL;de Oliveira RD;da Silva PV;de Castro DB;Sampaio VS;de Albuquerque BC;Ramos TCA;Fraxe SHH;da Costa CF;Naveca FG;Siqueira AM;de Araújo WN;Andrews JR;Cummings DAT;Ko AI;Croda J
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variant, Gamma, emerged in the city of Manaus in late 2020 during a large resurgence of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and has spread throughout Brazil. The effectiveness of vaccines in settings with widespread Gamma variant transmission has not been reported. We performed a matched test-negative case-control study to estimate the effectiveness of an inactivated vaccine, CoronaVac, in healthcare workers (HCWs) in Manaus, where the Gamma variant accounted for 86% of genotyped SARS-CoV-2 samples at the peak of its epidemic. We performed an early analysis of effectiveness following administration of at least one vaccine dose and an analysis of effectiveness of the two-dose schedule. The primary outcome was symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. For the early at-least-one-dose and two-dose analyses the study population was, respectively, 53,176 and 53,153 HCWs residing in Manaus and aged 18 years or older, with complete information on age, residence, and vaccination status. Among 53,153 HCWs eligible for the two-dose analysis, 47,170 (89%) received at least one dose of CoronaVac and 2,656 individuals (5%) underwent RT-PCR testing from 19 January, 2021 to 13 April, 2021. Of 3,195 RT-PCR tests, 885 (28%) were positive. 393 and 418 case-control pairs were selected for the early and two-dose analyses, respectively, matched on calendar time, age, and neighbourhood. Among those who had received both vaccine doses before the RT-PCR sample collection date, the average time from second dose to sample collection date was 14 days (IQR 7-24). In the early analysis, vaccination with at least one dose was associated with a 0.50-fold reduction (adjusted vaccine effectiveness (VE), 49.6%, 95% CI 11.3 to 71.4) in the odds of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection during the period 14 days or more after receiving the first dose. However, we estimated low effectiveness (adjusted VE 36.8%, 95% CI -54.9 to 74.2) of the two-dose schedule against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection during the period 14 days or more after receiving the second dose. A finding that vaccinated individuals were much more likely to be infected than unvaccinated individuals in the period 0-13 days after first dose (aOR 2.11, 95% CI 1.36-3.27) suggests that unmeasured confounding led to downward bias in the vaccine effectiveness estimate. Evidence from this test-negative study of the effectiveness of CoronaVac was mixed, and likely affected by bias in this setting. Administration of at least one vaccine dose showed effectiveness against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in the setting of epidemic Gamma variant transmission. However, the low estimated effectiveness of the two-dose schedule underscores the need to maintain non-pharmaceutical interventions while vaccination campaigns with CoronaVac are being implemented. Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz); Municipal Health Secretary of Manaus; Fundação de Vigilância em Saúde do Amazonas
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
82.9
作者:
Ebinger JE;Fert-Bober J;Printsev I;Wu M;Sun N;Prostko JC;Frias EC;Stewart JL;Van Eyk JE;Braun JG;Cheng S;Sobhani K
通讯作者:
Sobhani K
影响因子:
64.5
作者:
Hoffmann M;Arora P;Groß R;Seidel A;Hörnich BF;Hahn AS;Krüger N;Graichen L;Hofmann-Winkler H;Kempf A;Winkler MS;Schulz S;Jäck HM;Jahrsdörfer B;Schrezenmeier H;Müller M;Kleger A;Münch J;Pöhlmann S
通讯作者:
Pöhlmann S
影响因子:
8.4
作者:
Amzat, Jimoh;Aminu, Kafayat;Danjibo, Maryann C.
通讯作者:
Danjibo, Maryann C.
影响因子:
82.9
作者:
Naveca, Felipe Gomes;Nascimento, Valdinete;Bello, Gonzalo
通讯作者:
Bello, Gonzalo
DOI:
10.1126/science.abh2644
发表时间:
2021-05-21
期刊:
Science (New York, N.Y.)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Faria NR;Mellan TA;Whittaker C;Claro IM;Candido DDS;Mishra S;Crispim MAE;Sales FCS;Hawryluk I;McCrone JT;Hulswit RJG;Franco LAM;Ramundo MS;de Jesus JG;Andrade PS;Coletti TM;Ferreira GM;Silva CAM;Manuli ER;Pereira RHM;Peixoto PS;Kraemer MUG;Gaburo N Jr;Camilo CDC;Hoeltgebaum H;Souza WM;Rocha EC;de Souza LM;de Pinho MC;Araujo LJT;Malta FSV;de Lima AB;Silva JDP;Zauli DAG;Ferreira ACS;Schnekenberg RP;Laydon DJ;Walker PGT;Schlüter HM;Dos Santos ALP;Vidal MS;Del Caro VS;Filho RMF;Dos Santos HM;Aguiar RS;Proença-Modena JL;Nelson B;Hay JA;Monod M;Miscouridou X;Coupland H;Sonabend R;Vollmer M;Gandy A;Prete CA Jr;Nascimento VH;Suchard MA;Bowden TA;Pond SLK;Wu CH;Ratmann O;Ferguson NM;Dye C;Loman NJ;Lemey P;Rambaut A;Fraiji NA;Carvalho MDPSS;Pybus OG;Flaxman S;Bhatt S;Sabino EC
通讯作者:
Sabino EC