Multiple sclerosis therapies differentially affect SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced antibody and T cell immunity and function.

Multiple sclerosis therapies differentially affect SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced antibody and T cell immunity and function.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1172/jci.insight.156978
复制
发表时间:
2022-02-22
期刊:
影响因子:
8
通讯作者:
Bove R
Bove R
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sabatino JJ Jr;Mittl K;Rowles WM;McPolin K;Rajan JV;Laurie MT;Zamecnik CR;Dandekar R;Alvarenga BD;Loudermilk RP;Gerungan C;Spencer CM;Sagan SA;Augusto DG;Alexander JR;DeRisi JL;Hollenbach JA;Wilson MR;Zamvil SS;Bove R

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

疫苗诱导的适应性免疫是控制SARS-CoV-2感染的先决条件。多发性硬化症(MS)疾病修饰疗法(dmt)不同地针对体液和细胞免疫。需要对MS dmt对SARS-CoV-2疫苗特异性免疫的影响进行全面比较,包括定量和功能性B细胞和T细胞反应。在80名研究参与者中,在接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗之前和之后测量了尖峰特异性Ab和T细胞反应,包括健康对照组和6组DMT患者:未经治疗和接受醋酸格拉替拉默(GA)、富马酸二甲酯(DMF)、那他珠单抗(NTZ)、鞘氨醇-1-磷酸(S1P)受体调节剂和抗cd20单抗治疗。通过Luminex试验、VirScan和假病毒中和来评估抗spike- ab反应。针刺特异性CD4+和CD8+ T细胞反应通过激活诱导的标志物和细胞因子表达和四聚体来表征。抗刺突IgG水平在健康对照组和未经治疗的MS患者以及接受GA、DMF或NTZ治疗的患者之间相似,但在抗cd20 mAb和s1p治疗的患者中有所降低。抗cd20单抗治疗患者的抗尖峰血清阳性与CD19+ B细胞水平相关,与累积治疗时间呈负相关。在抗cd20 mAb和s1p治疗的患者中,刺突表位反应性和假病毒中和性降低。在所有组中,尖峰特异性CD4+和CD8+ T细胞的反应性都保持强劲,但s1p治疗的患者除外,后者疫苗后CD4+ T细胞反应减弱。这些发现来自于暴露于广泛MS免疫疗法的大型MS患者队列,对治疗特异性COVID-19临床指南具有重要意义。NIH资助项目1K08NS107619、K08NS096117、R01AI159260、R01NS092835、R01AI131624和R21NS108159;NMSS授予TA-1903-33713和RG1701-26628;Westridge基金会;陈·扎克伯格Biohub;Maisin基础。
Vaccine-elicited adaptive immunity is a prerequisite for control of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) differentially target humoral and cellular immunity. A comprehensive comparison of the effects of MS DMTs on SARS-CoV-2 vaccine–specific immunity is needed, including quantitative and functional B and T cell responses. Spike-specific Ab and T cell responses were measured before and following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a cohort of 80 study participants, including healthy controls and patients with MS in 6 DMT groups: untreated and treated with glatiramer acetate (GA), dimethyl fumarate (DMF), natalizumab (NTZ), sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators, and anti-CD20 mAbs. Anti–spike-Ab responses were assessed by Luminex assay, VirScan, and pseudovirus neutralization. Spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were characterized by activation-induced marker and cytokine expression and tetramer. Anti-spike IgG levels were similar between healthy control participants and patients with untreated MS and those receiving GA, DMF, or NTZ but were reduced in anti-CD20 mAb– and S1P-treated patients. Anti-spike seropositivity in anti-CD20 mAb–treated patients was correlated with CD19+ B cell levels and inversely correlated with cumulative treatment duration. Spike epitope reactivity and pseudovirus neutralization were reduced in anti-CD20 mAb– and S1P-treated patients. Spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell reactivity remained robust across all groups, except in S1P-treated patients, in whom postvaccine CD4+ T cell responses were attenuated. These findings from a large cohort of patients with MS exposed to a wide spectrum of MS immunotherapies have important implications for treatment-specific COVID-19 clinical guidelines. NIH grants 1K08NS107619, K08NS096117, R01AI159260, R01NS092835, R01AI131624, and R21NS108159; NMSS grants TA-1903-33713 and RG1701-26628; Westridge Foundation; Chan Zuckerberg Biohub; Maisin Foundation.
DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.10.006
发表时间: 2020-11-17
期刊: Immunity
影响因子: 32.4
作者:
Ferretti AP;Kula T;Wang Y;Nguyen DMV;Weinheimer A;Dunlap GS;Xu Q;Nabilsi N;Perullo CR;Cristofaro AW;Whitton HJ;Virbasius A;Olivier KJ Jr;Buckner LR;Alistar AT;Whitman ED;Bertino SA;Chattopadhyay S;MacBeath G
通讯作者: MacBeath G
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2852-1
发表时间: 2020-12
期刊: Nature
影响因子: 64.8
作者:
Barnes CO;Jette CA;Abernathy ME;Dam KA;Esswein SR;Gristick HB;Malyutin AG;Sharaf NG;Huey-Tubman KE;Lee YE;Robbiani DF;Nussenzweig MC;West AP Jr;Bjorkman PJ
通讯作者: Bjorkman PJ
DOI: 10.1177/17562864211012835
发表时间: 2021
影响因子: 5.9
作者:
Achiron A;Mandel M;Dreyer-Alster S;Harari G;Magalashvili D;Sonis P;Dolev M;Menascu S;Flechter S;Falb R;Gurevich M
通讯作者: Gurevich M
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1810470115
发表时间: 2018-09-25
影响因子: 11.1
作者:
Häusler D;Häusser-Kinzel S;Feldmann L;Torke S;Lepennetier G;Bernard CCA;Zamvil SS;Brück W;Lehmann-Horn K;Weber MS
通讯作者: Weber MS
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2004-06-2075
发表时间: 2004-12-15
期刊: BLOOD
影响因子: 20.3
作者:
Han, SH;Zhang, XJ;Zheng, B
通讯作者: Zheng, B