Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.
Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.
复制标题
将单词片段完成和提示回忆与字母提示进行比较。
DOI:
10.1037//0278-7393.13.4.542
复制
发表时间:
1987
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Keelean,PD
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Nelson,DL;Canas,JJ;Bajo,MT;Keelean,PD
Cued recall with word stems as cues and fragment completion rely on different types of letter cues and also differ in the explicit–implicit nature of the retrieval orientation. Despite these differences, variables effective in one task may be effective in the other because both rely on letter cues. Two variables known to affect cued recall were manipulated: Lexical set size (number of words that fit the letter cue) and meaning set size (number of associates generated to the studied words). Across four experiments, subjects in each task were less likely to recover targets from larger lexical sets. However, meaning set size affected cued recall but not fragment completion. These results indicate that fragment completion and letter-cued recall are based on lexical search but that cued recall also involves a semantic search component. Furthermore, type of retrieval cue had a greater effect than type of retrieval orientation.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved)
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
64.5
作者:
QUERY, CC;KEENE, JD
通讯作者:
KEENE, JD
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
E. Morgan;W. Weigle
通讯作者:
W. Weigle
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1983
期刊:
The Lancet
影响因子:
--
作者:
P. Plotz
通讯作者:
P. Plotz
影响因子:
29.7
作者:
H. Smith;A. Steinberg
通讯作者:
H. Smith;A. Steinberg
影响因子:
56.9
作者:
R. T. Wold;F. Young;E. Tan;R. Farr
通讯作者:
R. Farr