Predictors of survival after total laryngectomy for recurrent/persistent laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Predictors of survival after total laryngectomy for recurrent/persistent laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1002/hed.24918
复制
发表时间:
2017-12
期刊:
Head & neck
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Spector ME
Spector ME
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Birkeland AC;Beesley L;Bellile E;Rosko AJ;Hoesli R;Chinn SB;Shuman AG;Prince ME;Wolf GT;Bradford CR;Brenner JC;Spector ME

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

全喉切除术仍然是放疗(RT)或放化疗(CRT)后复发/持续性喉鳞状细胞癌(LSCC)的治疗选择。然而,尽管尝试积极的手术挽救,在这个队列中的生存率仍然不理想。对1998年至2015年期间在初始RT/CRT后因复发性/持续性LSCC接受全喉切除术的患者(n=244)进行了前瞻性维护的单机构数据库查询。提取人口统计学、临床和生存数据。计算Kaplan Meier生存曲线和风险比(HR)。5年总生存率为49%。5年无病生存率为58%。总生存期的独立预测因素包括重度合并症[ACE-27量表](HR 3.76; 95% CI 1.56 - 9.06)和阳性复发临床淋巴结(HR 2.91; 95% CI 1.74 - 4.88)。严重合并症状态是总生存率的最强预测因子,这表明增加对减轻健康竞争风险的关注至关重要。这些数据可以为风险预测模型提供信息,以允许集中的共享决策,术前健康优化和辅助治疗的患者选择。
Total laryngectomy remains the treatment of choice for recurrent/persistent laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma(LSCC) after radiation(RT) or chemoradiation(CRT). However, despite attempts at aggressive surgical salvage, survival in this cohort remains suboptimal. A prospectively-maintained single-institution database was queried for patients undergoing total laryngectomy for recurrent/persistent LSCC after initial RT/CRT between 1998–2015(n=244). Demographic, clinical, and survival data were abstracted. Kaplan Meier survival curves and hazard ratios(HR) were calculated. Five-year overall survival was 49%. Five-year disease-free survival was 58%. Independent predictors of overall survival included severe comorbidity[ACE-27 scale](HR 3.76; 95% CI 1.56 – 9.06), and positive recurrent clinical nodes(HR 2.91; 95% CI 1.74 – 4.88). Severe comorbidity status is the strongest predictor of overall survival, suggesting that increased attention to mitigating competing risks to health is critical. These data may inform a risk prediction model to allow for focused shared decision-making, preoperative health optimization and patient selection for adjuvant therapies.
DOI: 10.1002/hed.24355
发表时间: 2016-04-01
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
Sandulache, Vlad C.;Vandelaar, Laura J.;Zafereo, Mark E.
通讯作者: Zafereo, Mark E.
DOI: 10.1056/nejm199106133242402
发表时间: 1991-06-13
影响因子: 158.5
作者:
WOLF, GT
通讯作者: WOLF, GT
DOI: 10.3322/caac.21254
发表时间: 2010-09-01
影响因子: 254.7
作者:
Jemal, Ahmedin;Siegel, Rebecca;Ward, Elizabeth
通讯作者: Ward, Elizabeth
DOI: 10.1177/0194599815627811
发表时间: 2016-03-01
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
Birkeland, Andrew C.;Rosko, Andrew J.;Spector, Matthew E.
通讯作者: Spector, Matthew E.
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa031317
发表时间: 2003-11-27
影响因子: 158.5
作者:
Forastiere, AA;Goepfert, H;Cooper, J
通讯作者: Cooper, J