Pervasive adaptive protein evolution apparent in diversity patterns around amino acid substitutions in Drosophila simulans.
Pervasive adaptive protein evolution apparent in diversity patterns around amino acid substitutions in Drosophila simulans.
复制标题
模拟果蝇中氨基酸取代的多样性模式中普遍存在适应性蛋白质进化。
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1001302
复制
发表时间:
2011-02-10
期刊:
影响因子:
4.5
通讯作者:
Sella G
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sattath S;Elyashiv E;Kolodny O;Rinott Y;Sella G
In Drosophila, multiple lines of evidence converge in suggesting that beneficial substitutions to the genome may be common. All suffer from confounding factors, however, such that the interpretation of the evidence—in particular, conclusions about the rate and strength of beneficial substitutions—remains tentative. Here, we use genome-wide polymorphism data in D. simulans and sequenced genomes of its close relatives to construct a readily interpretable characterization of the effects of positive selection: the shape of average neutral diversity around amino acid substitutions. As expected under recurrent selective sweeps, we find a trough in diversity levels around amino acid but not around synonymous substitutions, a distinctive pattern that is not expected under alternative models. This characterization is richer than previous approaches, which relied on limited summaries of the data (e.g., the slope of a scatter plot), and relates to underlying selection parameters in a straightforward way, allowing us to make more reliable inferences about the prevalence and strength of adaptation. Specifically, we develop a coalescent-based model for the shape of the entire curve and use it to infer adaptive parameters by maximum likelihood. Our inference suggests that ∼13% of amino acid substitutions cause selective sweeps. Interestingly, it reveals two classes of beneficial fixations: a minority (approximately 3%) that appears to have had large selective effects and accounts for most of the reduction in diversity, and the remaining 10%, which seem to have had very weak selective effects. These estimates therefore help to reconcile the apparent conflict among previously published estimates of the strength of selection. More generally, our findings provide unequivocal evidence for strongly beneficial substitutions in Drosophila and illustrate how the rapidly accumulating genome-wide data can be leveraged to address enduring questions about the genetic basis of adaptation. Characterizing the nature of beneficial changes to the genome is essential to our understanding of adaptation. To do so, researchers identify and analyze footprints that beneficial changes leave in patterns of genetic variation within and between species. In order to teach us about adaptive evolution, these footprints need to be specific to positive selection as well as rich enough to allow for reliable inferences. Here, we identify such a footprint: a pronounced trough in the average levels of genetic diversity surrounding amino acid substitutions throughout the D. simulans genome. Based on this pattern, we infer that approximately 13% of amino acid substitutions were beneficial, a minority of which (3%) conferred a large selective advantage of nearly 0.5% and the majority of which (10%) conferred a much smaller advantage of about 0.01%. These findings offer insights into the distribution of selection effects driving beneficial changes to the D. simulans genome and suggest how the widely varying estimates obtained in previous studies of Drosophila may be reconciled. Moreover, the approach that we introduce is readily applicable to other taxa and thus should help to gain important insights into how the rate and strength of adaptive evolution vary depending on life-history, population size, and ecology.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Clark, Andrew G.;Eisen, Michael B.;MacCallum, Iain
通讯作者:
MacCallum, Iain
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
OHTA, T
通讯作者:
OHTA, T
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Fay, JC;Wyckoff, GJ;Wu, CI
通讯作者:
Wu, CI
影响因子:
9.8
作者:
Begun, David J.;Holloway, Alisha K.;Stevens, Kristian;Hillier, LaDeana W.;Poh, Yu-Ping;Hahn, Matthew W.;Nista, Phillip M.;Jones, Corbin D.;Kern, Andrew D.;Dewey, Colin N.;Pachter, Lior;Myers, Eugene;Langley, Charles H.
通讯作者:
Langley, Charles H.
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
MCDONALD, JH;KREITMAN, M
通讯作者:
KREITMAN, M