Brain-computer interface robotics for hand rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review.
Brain-computer interface robotics for hand rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review.
复制标题
用于中风后手部康复的脑机接口机器人技术:一项系统综述
DOI:
10.1186/s12984-021-00820-8
复制
发表时间:
2021-01-23
影响因子:
5.1
通讯作者:
Holt RJ
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Baniqued PDE;Stanyer EC;Awais M;Alazmani A;Jackson AE;Mon-Williams MA;Mushtaq F;Holt RJ
Hand rehabilitation is core to helping stroke survivors regain activities of daily living. Recent studies have suggested that the use of electroencephalography-based brain-computer interfaces (BCI) can promote this process. Here, we report the first systematic examination of the literature on the use of BCI-robot systems for the rehabilitation of fine motor skills associated with hand movement and profile these systems from a technical and clinical perspective. A search for January 2010–October 2019 articles using Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PEDro, PsycINFO, IEEE Xplore and Cochrane Library databases was performed. The selection criteria included BCI-hand robotic systems for rehabilitation at different stages of development involving tests on healthy participants or people who have had a stroke. Data fields include those related to study design, participant characteristics, technical specifications of the system, and clinical outcome measures. 30 studies were identified as eligible for qualitative review and among these, 11 studies involved testing a BCI-hand robot on chronic and subacute stroke patients. Statistically significant improvements in motor assessment scores relative to controls were observed for three BCI-hand robot interventions. The degree of robot control for the majority of studies was limited to triggering the device to perform grasping or pinching movements using motor imagery. Most employed a combination of kinaesthetic and visual response via the robotic device and display screen, respectively, to match feedback to motor imagery. 19 out of 30 studies on BCI-robotic systems for hand rehabilitation report systems at prototype or pre-clinical stages of development. We identified large heterogeneity in reporting and emphasise the need to develop a standard protocol for assessing technical and clinical outcomes so that the necessary evidence base on efficiency and efficacy can be developed.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.3389/fneng.2014.00030
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
Frontiers in neuroengineering
影响因子:
--
作者:
Ang KK;Guan C;Phua KS;Wang C;Zhou L;Tang KY;Ephraim Joseph GJ;Kuah CW;Chua KS
通讯作者:
Chua KS
DOI:
10.1016/j.nicl.2017.03.005
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
NeuroImage. Clinical
影响因子:
--
作者:
Belardinelli P;Laer L;Ortiz E;Braun C;Gharabaghi A
通讯作者:
Gharabaghi A
DOI:
10.1109/jbhi.2018.2863212
发表时间:
2018-11-01
影响因子:
7.7
作者:
Chowdhury, Anirban;Meena, Yogesh Kumar;Prasad, Girijesh
通讯作者:
Prasad, Girijesh
影响因子:
--
作者:
Berger, H
通讯作者:
Berger, H
影响因子:
5.4
作者:
Chang, Ching-Yi;Sung, Han-Yu;Kuo, Fan-Ray
通讯作者:
Kuo, Fan-Ray