Why the standard view is standard: people, not machines, understand patients' problems.
Why the standard view is standard: people, not machines, understand patients' problems.
复制标题
为什么标准观点是标准的:理解患者问题的是人,而不是机器。
DOI:
10.1093/jmp/15.6.581
复制
发表时间:
1990
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Miller,RA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Miller,RA
The ‘Standard View’ regarding computer-based medical diagnostic decision support programs is that, while such systems may be useful adjuncts to human decision-making, they cannot replace human diagnosticians. Mazoué (1990) disputes this viewpoint. He notes that human diagnosis is prone to a variety of errors, and claims that the processes of data collection for diagnosis and the intellectual task of making a diagnosis are independent. Mazoué believes that recent progress in computer-based diagnosis has been encouraging enough to consider the concept of “human-assisted computer diagnosis”. This commentary explains why the Standard View should remain standard. Diagnosis is a complex process more involved than producing a nosological label for a set of patient descriptors. Efficient and ethical diagnostic evaluation requires a broad knowledge of people and of disease states. The state of the art in computer-based medical diagnosis does not support the optimistic claim that people can now be replaced by more reliable diagnostic programs.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.6
作者:
JANIN, J;CHOTHIA, C
通讯作者:
CHOTHIA, C
影响因子:
5.6
作者:
Wolfram Bode;P. Schwager
通讯作者:
P. Schwager
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
I. Simon;E. Tüchsen;C. Woodward
通讯作者:
C. Woodward
影响因子:
5.6
作者:
A. Wlodawer;J. Walter;R. Huber;L. Sjölin
通讯作者:
L. Sjölin
影响因子:
--
作者:
M. Laskowski;M. Laskowski
通讯作者:
M. Laskowski