The art of recruitment: the foundation of family and linkage studies of psychiatric illness.

The art of recruitment: the foundation of family and linkage studies of psychiatric illness.
复制标题

招募的艺术:家庭和精神疾病联系研究的基础。

DOI:
10.1111/j.1545-5300.1998.00153.x
复制
发表时间:
1998
期刊:
影响因子:
3.9
通讯作者:
K. Bonvicini
K. Bonvicini
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
K. Bonvicini

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

精神疾病的家庭和联系研究涉及科学调查领域的特殊利益和挑战。家系或连锁研究的成功取决于招募过程。在这一调查领域中,信息量最大、最可靠的数据收集方法是与尽可能多的家庭成员直接面谈。虽然有些情况下不可能进行直接面谈,但也有其他情况,如亲属拒绝参加,值得更仔细地审查。文献中探讨了在进行医疗调查时征聘过程的复杂性。然而,与招募过程有关的特殊问题值得进一步探讨,以便在精神病家庭和联系研究的背景下与家庭合作。仔细了解这种精神疾病。仔细了解这一关键问题可能会尽量减少家庭不参与此类研究工作的发生率。本文讨论这些问题,因为它们涉及到招募个人及其家属在这一领域的调查。这些问题包括态度,价值观和信仰,家庭互动和有影响力的成员的识别,非正式的通信网络,知情同意,同时促进研究和伦理问题的作用。
Family and linkage studies of psychiatric illness involve special benefits and challenges in the field of scientific investigation. The success of a family or linkage study is dependent on the recruitment process. The most informative and reliable method of data collection in this field of investigation is through direct interviews with as many family members as possible. Although there are circumstances when direct interviewing is not possible, there are other circumstances, such as refusal of relatives to participate, that deserve closer scrutiny. The complexities involved in the recruitment process while conducting medical investigations have been explored in the literature. However, special issues relevant to the recruitment process merit further exploration for working with families in the context of family and linkage studies of psychiatric illness. Careful understanding of this psychiatric illness. Careful understanding of this critical topic may minimize the incidence of family nonparticipation in such research endeavors. This article addresses these issues as they relate to recruiting individuals and their families in this field of investigation. These issues include the role of attitudes, values and beliefs, family interaction and the identification of influential members, informal communication networking, informed consent while promoting the research, and ethical concerns.
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800110090012
发表时间: 1986-11
影响因子: --
作者:
M. Weissman;K. Merikangas;K. John;P. Wickramaratne;B. Prusoff;K. Kidd
通讯作者: M. Weissman;K. Merikangas;K. John;P. Wickramaratne;B. Prusoff;K. Kidd
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800050019002
发表时间: 1986
影响因子: --
作者:
Andreasen,NC;Rice,J;Endicott,J;Reich,T;Coryell,W
通讯作者: Coryell,W
向家人汇报:研究是一种干预吗?
DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1995.00145.x
发表时间: 1995
期刊: Family process
影响因子: 3.9
作者:
Bussell,DA;Matsey,KC;Reiss,D;Hetherington,M
通讯作者: Hetherington,M
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820190029004
发表时间: 1993-07
影响因子: --
作者:
K. Kendler;M. McGuire;A. Gruenberg;A. O’Hare;Mary Spellman;D. Walsh
通讯作者: K. Kendler;M. McGuire;A. Gruenberg;A. O’Hare;Mary Spellman;D. Walsh
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790120015003
发表时间: 1984
影响因子: --
作者:
Weissman,MM;Gershon,ES;Kidd,KK;Prusoff,BA;Leckman,JF;Dibble,E;Hamovit,J;Thompson,WD;Pauls,DL;Guroff,JJ
通讯作者: Guroff,JJ