Comparing the handwriting behaviours of true and false writing with computerized handwriting measures
Comparing the handwriting behaviours of true and false writing with computerized handwriting measures
复制标题
用电脑笔迹测量方法比较真假书写的笔迹行为
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Rosenblum
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. Luria;S. Rosenblum
本研究的目的是比较真实书写和虚假书写的书写行为。基于在传达欺骗性信息时所经历的认知负荷和非自动性，我们假设真实信息和虚假信息的笔迹之间存在差异（在时间和空间、压力测量和峰值速度方面）。34名参与者在数字化仪上写下正确和错误的句子，这是一个名为计算机书法评估工具（ComPET）的新系统的一部分。ComPET评估脑手的表现，通过书写行为表现出来，并且被发现是检测非自动性的有效措施，这是临床领域某些疾病的指示。在平均压力、空间测量（平均行程长度和平均行程高度）上发现差异，但在时间测量和峰值速度数量上没有发现差异。讨论了ComPET在测谎中的应用。版权所有©2009 John Wiley & Sons， Ltd
The goal of this study is to compare the handwriting behaviours of true and false writing. Based on the cognitive load and dis-automaticity known to be experienced while communicating a deceptive message, we hypothesized a difference (in temporal and spatial, pressure measures and peak velocities) between the handwriting of true vs. false messages. Thirty-four participants wrote true and false sentences on a digitizer, which is part of a new system called the Computerized Penmanship Evaluation Tool (ComPET). The ComPET evaluates brain-hand performance, as manifested through handwriting behaviour, and was found to be a valid measure for detecting the dis-automaticity that is indicative of certain diseases in the clinical field. Differences were found in mean pressure, spatial measures (mean stroke length and mean stroke height), but no differences were found in temporal measures and in the number of peak velocities. The use of ComPET in lie detection is discussed. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1977
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
W. Schneider;R. Shiffrin
通讯作者：
W. Schneider;R. Shiffrin
精神和运动负荷对帕金森病患者书写动作的影响。
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
vanGemmert,AW;Teulings,HL;Stelmach,GE
通讯作者：
Stelmach,GE
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Allen, JJB;Iacono, WG
通讯作者：
Iacono, WG
年轻人和老年人的手写表现：年龄、熟悉程度和练习效果。
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Dixon,RA;Kurzman,D;Friesen,IC
通讯作者：
Friesen,IC