Neoliberalism, the University, Public Goods and Agricultural Innovation
Neoliberalism, the University, Public Goods and Agricultural Innovation
复制标题
新自由主义、大学、公共产品和农业创新
DOI:
10.1111/soru.12074
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
4.1
通讯作者:
Glenna L
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Glenna L
After World War II, most industrialising nations adopted some form of welfare‐state approach to balance the economic activities of self‐interested agents and social welfare. In the realm of scientific research and innovation, this often meant that governments took primary responsibility for funding public research organisations, including research universities and government laboratories. Over the past four decades, however, the significance of private funding for agricultural research has increased, and academic scientists now often work in public‐private partnerships. We argue that this trend needs to be carefully monitored because public goods are likely to be overlooked and undervalued in such arrangements. In the interest of developing indicators to monitor the trend, we document public and private funding for agricultural research and agricultural innovation in four countries: the USA, the UK, Ireland and Germany. Our results show that although neoliberalism is evident in each country, it is not homogeneous in its application and impacts, suggesting that national and institutional contexts matter. This article is directed at stimulating debates on the relationships between university research, agricultural innovation and public goods.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
J. Bryden;K. Mittenzwei
通讯作者:
K. Mittenzwei
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
S. Khoo
通讯作者:
S. Khoo
影响因子:
3
作者:
Gerard Delanty
通讯作者:
Gerard Delanty
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
K. Moore;D. Kleinman;D. Hess;S. Frickel
通讯作者:
S. Frickel
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
L. Glenna;R. Welsh;D. Ervin;W. Lacy;Dina Biscotti
通讯作者:
Dina Biscotti