Incentivising bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) responsibly: Comparing stakeholder policy preferences in the United Kingdom and Sweden
Incentivising bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) responsibly: Comparing stakeholder policy preferences in the United Kingdom and Sweden
复制标题
负责任地通过碳捕获和储存（BECCS）激励生物能源：比较英国和瑞典的利益相关者政策偏好
DOI：
10.1016/j.envsci.2020.09.022
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
6
通讯作者：
Simon Haikola
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Bellamy;M. Fridahl;J. Lezaun;J. Palmer;Emily Rodriguez;Adrian Lefvert;A. Hansson;Stefan Grönkvist;Simon Haikola
具有碳捕获和封存的生物能源(BECCS)在根据《巴黎协定》目标限制全球变暖的情景路径中发挥核心作用。然而，旨在激励BECCS的深思熟虑的政策努力--无论是通过修改现有气候政策还是引入全新的气候政策--仍然很少。在这篇文章中，我们认为，必须通过考虑到不同和地理上不同的社会价值观和利益的政策制定过程，负责任地激励BECCS。更具体地说，我们通过对英国和瑞典的利益相关者对BECCS的四种理想化政策情景的态度进行比较分析，提出了负责任激励的理由，其中包括政府、企业、非政府组织和学术界的代表。这些情景是：一切照旧；国际政策改革；BECCS国家政策；负排放技术国家政策。根据我们的研究结果，我们建议政策制定者1)认识到有必要制定新的激励措施，并对现有政策工具进行有利的改革；2)考虑在其现实世界(而不是抽象的)环境中缓解威慑的风险；3)采用不过度依赖碳定价的多种手段进行激励；4)强制在特定技术政策和技术中立政策之间做出选择；5)关注利益相关者和更广泛的公众视角的多样性，这将最终决定其政策设计的成败。
Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) plays a central role in scenario pathways that limit global warming in line with the objectives of the Paris Agreement. Yet deliberate policy efforts to incentivise BECCS—whether through amending existing climate policies or introducing entirely new ones—remain rare. In this paper, we contend that BECCS must be incentivised responsibly, through policy-making processes which account for diverse and geographically varying societal values and interests. More specifically, we make the case for responsible incentivisation by undertaking a comparative analysis of stakeholder attitudes to four idealised policy scenarios for BECCS, including representatives of government, business, nongovernmental and academic communities, in the UK and Sweden. The scenarios were: business as usual; international policy reform; national BECCS policy; and national policy for negative emissions technologies. Based on our findings, we recommend that policymakers 1) recognise the need to develop new incentives and make enabling reforms to existing policy instruments; 2) consider the risk of mitigation deterrence in their real world (and not abstracted) contexts; 3) employ multi-instrument approaches to incentivisation that do not overly rely on carbon pricing or 4) force a choice between technology specific or technology neutral policies; and 5) attend to the diversity of stakeholder and wider public perspectives that will ultimately determine the success—or failure—of their policy designs.
将二氧化碳清除纳入欧盟气候政策：范式转变的前景
DOI：
10.1002/wcc.521
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
WIREs Climate Change
影响因子：
--
作者：
Geden O
通讯作者：
Geden O
温室气体清除的有争议的框架及其可行性：社会和政治层面
DOI：
10.1002/wcc.649
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
WIREs Climate Change
影响因子：
--
作者：
Waller L
通讯作者：
Waller L
绘制温室气体清除的可行性：关键问题、差距和开放评估
DOI：
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102073
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
Global Environmental Change
影响因子：
--
作者：
Forster J
通讯作者：
Forster J