Mindfulness Training, Implicit Bias, and Force Response Decision-making.
Mindfulness Training, Implicit Bias, and Force Response Decision-making.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s12671-019-01213-8
复制
发表时间：
2019-12
期刊：
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Schmidt AM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hunsinger M;Christopher M;Schmidt AM
本研究的目的是评估基于正念的训练（基于正念的弹性训练; MBRT）在提高执法人员（LEO）之间的武器识别的初步疗效。参与者（N = 61）被随机分配到MBRT或无干预对照组（NIC）。在基线、培训后和干预完成后三个月，进行了评估正念的自我报告问卷和评估内隐刻板印象依赖的计算机化测量。我们还收集了MBRT组中LEO训练之外的冥想练习信息。推理分析表明，与NIC相比，MBRT组的正念有所改善。分析没有提供基线时内隐刻板印象依赖的证据，因此MBRT与NIC对内隐刻板印象依赖没有显著影响，ps > .05;然而，与白色男性目标相比，两种条件下的参与者在回应黑人男性目标时表现出更多的控制力，F（1，74）= 3.98，p = 0.05，95% CI [-0.05，-0.01]，d = 0.36。我们的研究结果并没有提供证据的MBRT武器识别的影响，但确实表明，低地球轨道卫星作出更多的努力时，响应图像的黑人男性相比，白色男性。我们讨论了未来评估内隐刻板印象依赖的临床试验的建议，即，研究人员使用的措施更敏感，更广泛的低地球轨道样本和更高的生态有效性，我们讨论了潜在的原因，为什么我们的结果不符合过去的研究。
The goal of this study was to assess the preliminary efficacy of a Mindfulness-Based Training (Mindfulness-based Resilience Training; MBRT) in improving weapon identification among Law Enforcement Officers (LEOs). Participants (N = 61) were randomly assigned to either MBRT or a no-intervention control group (NIC). A self-report questionnaire assessing mindfulness and a computerized measure assessing implicit stereotype reliance were administered at baseline, post-training, and three months following intervention completion. We also collected information about meditation practice outside of the training for LEOs in the MBRT group. Inferential analyses yielded improvements in mindfulness in the MBRT group compared to NIC. Analyses did not provide evidence for implicit stereotype reliance at baseline and therefore did not yield a significant impact of MBRT versus NIC on implicit stereotype reliance, ps > .05; however, participants across both conditions exerted more control when responding to Black male targets compared to White male targets, F(1,74) = 3.98, p = .05, 95% CI [−.05, −.01], d = .36. Our results do not provide evidence for the impact of MBRT on weapon identification, but do suggest that LEOs exerted more effort when responding to images of Black males compared to White males. We discuss recommendations for future clinical trials assessing implicit stereotype reliance, viz., that researchers utilize measures more sensitive to a wider range of LEO samples and with higher ecological validity, and we discuss potential reasons why our results do not align with past research.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Crosswell AD;Moreno PI;Raposa EB;Motivala SJ;Stanton AL;Ganz PA;Bower JE
通讯作者：
Bower JE
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
de Bruin, Esther I.;Topper, Maurice;Kamphuis, Jan H.
通讯作者：
Kamphuis, Jan H.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Correll, Joshua;Park, Bernadette;Keesee, Tracie
通讯作者：
Keesee, Tracie
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Greenwald, AG;McGhee, DE;Schwartz, JLK
通讯作者：
Schwartz, JLK
影响因子：
1.9
作者：
Akinola, Modupe;Mendes, Wendy Berry
通讯作者：
Mendes, Wendy Berry