Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.2109229118
复制
发表时间:
2021-08-24
影响因子:
11.1
通讯作者:
Galvani AP
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Sah P;Fitzpatrick MC;Zimmer CF;Abdollahi E;Juden-Kelly L;Moghadas SM;Singer BH;Galvani AP
Asymptomatic infections have been widely reported for COVID-19. However, many studies do not distinguish between the presymptomatic stage and truly asymptomatic infections. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of COVID-19 literature reporting laboratory-confirmed infections to determine the burden of asymptomatic infections and removed index cases from our calculations to avoid conflation. By analyzing over 350 papers, we estimated that more than one-third of infections are truly asymptomatic. We found evidence of greater asymptomaticity in children compared with the elderly, and lower asymptomaticity among cases with comorbidities compared to cases with no underlying medical conditions. Greater asymptomaticity at younger ages suggests that heightened vigilance is needed among these individuals, to prevent spillover into the broader community. Quantification of asymptomatic infections is fundamental for effective public health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Discrepancies regarding the extent of asymptomaticity have arisen from inconsistent terminology as well as conflation of index and secondary cases which biases toward lower asymptomaticity. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and World Health Organization Global Research Database on COVID-19 between January 1, 2020 and April 2, 2021 to identify studies that reported silent infections at the time of testing, whether presymptomatic or asymptomatic. Index cases were removed to minimize representational bias that would result in overestimation of symptomaticity. By analyzing over 350 studies, we estimate that the percentage of infections that never developed clinical symptoms, and thus were truly asymptomatic, was 35.1% (95% CI: 30.7 to 39.9%). At the time of testing, 42.8% (95% prediction interval: 5.2 to 91.1%) of cases exhibited no symptoms, a group comprising both asymptomatic and presymptomatic infections. Asymptomaticity was significantly lower among the elderly, at 19.7% (95% CI: 12.7 to 29.4%) compared with children at 46.7% (95% CI: 32.0 to 62.0%). We also found that cases with comorbidities had significantly lower asymptomaticity compared to cases with no underlying medical conditions. Without proactive policies to detect asymptomatic infections, such as rapid contact tracing, prolonged efforts for pandemic control may be needed even in the presence of vaccination.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
8.5
作者:
Adorni F;Prinelli F;Bianchi F;Giacomelli A;Pagani G;Bernacchia D;Rusconi S;Maggi S;Trevisan C;Noale M;Molinaro S;Bastiani L;Fortunato L;Jesuthasan N;Sojic A;Pettenati C;Tavio M;Andreoni M;Mastroianni C;Antonelli Incalzi R;Galli M
通讯作者:
Galli M
影响因子:
4.5
作者:
Passarelli VC;Faico-Filho K;Moreira LVL;Luna LKS;Conte DD;Camargo C;Perosa AH;Bellei N
通讯作者:
Bellei N
DOI:
10.11604/pamj.supp.2020.37.28.26312
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
The Pan African medical journal
影响因子:
--
作者:
Adetola HH;Ishola D;Afolabi MO;Bangura J;Sesay IG;Pearce R;Garrick I;Kamara B;Leigh B;Greenwood B;Watson-Jones D
通讯作者:
Watson-Jones D
影响因子:
15.1
作者:
Almazeedi, Sulaiman;Al-Youha, Sarah;Al-Sabah, Salman
通讯作者:
Al-Sabah, Salman
影响因子:
1.8
作者:
Agresti, A;Coull, BA
通讯作者:
Coull, BA