A general benevolence dimension that links neural, psychological, economic, and life-span data on altruistic tendencies.

A general benevolence dimension that links neural, psychological, economic, and life-span data on altruistic tendencies.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/xge0000209
复制
发表时间:
2016-10
期刊:
Journal of experimental psychology. General
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Mayr U
Mayr U
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hubbard J;Harbaugh WT;Srivastava S;Degras D;Mayr U

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

慈善捐赠的个体差异和寿命差异是一种重要的经济力量,但其背后的动机还没有得到很好的理解。在一个成年人的寿命样本中,我们评估了亲社会倾向在三个不同测量领域的表现:(a)心理自我报告测量,(B)实际给予选择,(c)功能磁共振成像衍生的“纯粹利他主义”的神经信号。后者表达了个人在慈善机构收到钱时与自己收到钱时在估价领域的活动,从而反映了对他人的利他主义关注。基于结构方程模型和单位加权总得分的结果显示,一个强大的高阶一般仁慈的尺寸,占所有测量域的变异。神经测量可能反映了纯粹的利他主义倾向,这一事实表明,普遍仁慈是基于对他人的真正关心。此外,一般仁慈在成年人的一生中表现出强劲的增长,这可能为为什么老年人通常比年轻人对公共利益的贡献更大提供了一个重要的解释。
Individual and life-span differences in charitable giving are an important economic force, yet the underlying motives are not well understood. In an adult, life-span sample, we assessed manifestations of prosocial tendencies across three different measurement domains: (a) psychological self-report measures, (b) actual giving choices, and (c) fMRI-derived, neural signals of “pure altruism”. The latter expressed individuals’ activity in valuation areas when charities received money compared to when oneself received money and thus reflected an altruistic concern for others. Results based both on structural equation modeling and unit-weighted aggregate scores revealed a strong higher-order General Benevolence dimension that accounted for variability across all measurement domains. The fact that the neural measures likely reflect pure altruistic tendencies indicates that General Benevolence is based on a genuine concern for others. Furthermore, General Benevolence exhibited a robust increase across the adult life-span, potentially providing one important explanation for why older adults typically contribute more to the public good than young adults.
DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2011.00013
发表时间: 2011
影响因子: 3.5
作者:
Gorgolewski K;Burns CD;Madison C;Clark D;Halchenko YO;Waskom ML;Ghosh SS
通讯作者: Ghosh SS
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0395
发表时间: 1999-02-01
期刊: NEUROIMAGE
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
Dale, AM;Fischl, B;Sereno, MI
通讯作者: Sereno, MI
DOI: 10.2307/2234133
发表时间: 1990-06-01
期刊: ECONOMIC JOURNAL
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
ANDREONI, J
通讯作者: ANDREONI, J
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2007.06.004
发表时间: 2008-02-01
影响因子: 10.9
作者:
Avants, B. B.;Epstein, C. L.;Gee, J. C.
通讯作者: Gee, J. C.
DOI: 10.1126/science.1140738
发表时间: 2007-06-15
期刊: SCIENCE
影响因子: 56.9
作者:
Harbaugh, William T.;Mayr, Ulrich;Burghart, Daniel R.
通讯作者: Burghart, Daniel R.