All Tools are Informational Now: How Information and Persuasion Define the Tools of Government
All Tools are Informational Now: How Information and Persuasion Define the Tools of Government
复制标题
现在所有工具都是信息化的：信息和说服如何定义政府工具
DOI：
10.2139/ssrn.2141382
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. John
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. John
政府的工具箱越来越像一套信息提示和提示，公共行为者利用其权威来定义各种公众和组织行为者所接收的信息。公民和政府政策的其他目标，如组织和利益集团，可能会受到信息内容、论点或请求的框架以及信息是否在选择的呈现中呈现默认的影响，从而引导公民或其他行为者选择某些结果而不是其他结果。传统的政府、法律和金融工具需要一个支持性的信息环境才能有效，政府和其他公共部门组织越来越多地意识到这一点。英国政府最近的事态发展表明，轻推式干预和传统政策工具之间的区别无法维持。这些信息工具提高了政府的能力;它们可以帮助减轻过于依赖自上而下的干预形式的问题，并减轻对积极性的排挤。简而言之，以信息方式使用政府工具可以补充和加强更传统的干预形式。
The toolbox of governments increasingly resembles a set of information cues and prompts whereby public actors use their authority to define messages to be received by various publics and organisational actors. Citizens and other targets of government policy, such as organisations and interest groups, may be influenced by the content of messages, the framing of the argument or request, and whether the information presents a default in the presentation of choices, so that citizens or other actors are guided to choose certain outcomes and not others. The traditional tools of government, law and finance, need a supportive informational context to be effective, which is increasingly being realised by governments and other public sector organisations. Recent developments in British government show that the distinction between nudge-like interventions and the traditional policy instruments cannot be sustained. These informational tools have increased the capacity of government; they can help alleviate the problems of too great a reliance on top-down forms of intervention and mitigate the crowding out of motivation. In short, an informational approach to the use of the tools of government can complement and enhance more traditional forms of intervention.
为什么不一致的偏好并不能证明家长式作风的合理性
影响因子：
0.8
作者：
Sugden R
通讯作者：
Sugden R
影响因子：
8.7
作者：
Cotterill, Sarah;John, Peter;Nomura, Hisako
通讯作者：
Nomura, Hisako
利用反馈来改善环境结果：食物浪费计划的随机对照试验
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
Nomura H
通讯作者：
Nomura H