Does reduced employment protection increase the employment disadvantage of workers with low education and poorer health?

Does reduced employment protection increase the employment disadvantage of workers with low education and poorer health?
复制标题

DOI:
10.1136/jech-2020-213772
复制
发表时间:
2020-10
影响因子:
6.3
通讯作者:
Burdorf A
Burdorf A
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Schuring M;Robroek SJW;Carrino L;O'Prinsen AC;Oude Hengel KM;Avendano M;Burdorf A

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

就业保护的减少可能对教育程度低和健康状况较差的工人的就业机会产生不成比例的影响。这项研究调查了23个欧洲国家的就业保护水平的变化对教育和健康就业率的影响。数据来自欧盟收入和生活条件统计研究的4年轮换小组。从2003年到2014年,对29-59岁的就业参与者(n = 334 999)进行了为期1年的随访。采用具有国家和时期固定效应的逻辑回归模型,估计经济合作与发展组织(经合组织)就业保护指数变化与劳动力市场结果之间的关联,并纳入与教育和健康的相互作用。2003年至2014年,23个国家中有15个国家的就业保护水平下降。临时工的就业保护减少增加了提前退休(OR 6.29,95% CI 3.17至12.48)和失业(OR 1.37,95% CI 1.07至1.76)的几率。长期工作者就业保护的减少使健康状况不佳的工人(OR 4.46,95%CI 2.26至8.78)比健康状况良好的工人(OR 2.58,95%CI 1.30至5.10)提前退休的几率增加。受教育程度较低的工人(OR 1.47,95%CI 1.13至1.90)中临时工就业保护减少对失业的影响大于受教育程度较高的工人(OR 1.21,95%CI 0.95至1.54)。就业保护的减少增加了提前退出有偿就业的可能性,特别是在教育程度较低和健康状况较差的工人中。就业保护法可能有助于减少教育程度低和健康状况较差的工人的就业劣势。
Declines in employment protection may have disproportionate effects on employment opportunities of workers with low education and poorer health. This study investigates the impact of changes in employment protection levels on employment rates according to education and health in 23 European countries. Data were taken from the 4-year rotating panel European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions study. Employed participants aged 29–59 years (n = 334 999) were followed for 1 year over an 11-year period, from 2003 up to 2014. A logistic regression model with country and period fixed effects was used to estimate the association between changes in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) employment protection index and labour market outcomes, incorporating interaction terms with education and health. 15 of the 23 countries saw their level of employment protection decline between 2003 and 2014. Reduced employment protection of temporary workers increased odds of early retirement (OR 6.29, 95% CI 3.17 to 12.48) and unemployment (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.76). Reduced employment protection of permanent workers increased odds of early retirement more among workers in poor health (OR 4.46, 95% CI 2.26 to 8.78) than among workers in good health (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.30 to 5.10). The impact of reduced employment protection of temporary workers on unemployment was stronger among lower-educated workers (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.90) than among higher-educated workers (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.54). Reduced employment protection increased the odds of early exit from paid employment, especially among workers with lower education and poorer health. Employment protection laws may help reduce the employment disadvantage of workers with low education and poorer health.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2009.01.001
发表时间: 2009-06-01
影响因子: 11.1
作者:
Paul, Karsten I.;Moser, Klaus
通讯作者: Moser, Klaus
DOI: 10.1177/0020731415600408
发表时间: 2015-10-01
影响因子: 3.4
作者:
McAllister, Ashley;Nylen, Lotta;Burstrom, Bo
通讯作者: Burstrom, Bo
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3393
发表时间: 2014-03-01
影响因子: 6.3
作者:
de Wind, Astrid;Geuskens, Goedele A.;van der Beek, Allard J.
通讯作者: van der Beek, Allard J.
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3796
发表时间: 2019-01-01
影响因子: 6.3
作者:
Schuring, Merel;Schram, Jolinda L. D.;Burdorf, Alex
通讯作者: Burdorf, Alex
DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2005.09.001
发表时间: 2007-04-01
期刊: LABOUR ECONOMICS
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Guell, Mala;Petrongolo, Barbara
通讯作者: Petrongolo, Barbara