Differential effects of students' self-directed metacognitive prompts
Differential effects of students' self-directed metacognitive prompts
复制标题
学生自我导向元认知提示的差异效应
DOI:
10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.022
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Bannert
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pieger;Bannert
The present study aims at fostering learning behavior and learning outcomes in Computer-Based Learning Environments through metacognitive prompts. Thereby, two types of metacognitive prompts are compared with respect to learning behavior and learning outcomes. In a pre-post experimental design, students in experimental group 1 (N= 54) learned with predefined (fixed) metacognitive prompts whereas students in experimental group 2 (N= 54) were instructed to configure their own (self-directed) metacognitive prompts and to learn with them afterwards. Students in the control group (N= 55) received no instructional support and learned without prompts. The results show that self-directed and fixed prompts lead to less linear learning behavior than no prompts. Regarding learning outcomes, no significant main effects were found. Further, findings indicate that interactions between learner characteristics and treatment have a significant impact on learning behavior and learning outcomes. Students with lower verbal intelligence and reading competence especially seem to benefit from prompts. Hence, when prompting students, their learner characteristics should be considered. Further research should investigate further conditions and the underlying mechanisms of prompt use.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
0.7
作者:
T. Richter;N. Holt
通讯作者:
N. Holt
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Philip H. Winne;A. Hadwin
通讯作者:
A. Hadwin
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2008
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
J. Naumann;Tobias Richter;U. Christmann;Norbert Groeben
通讯作者:
Norbert Groeben
影响因子:
8.8
作者:
Greene, Jeffrey A.;Azevedo, Roger
通讯作者:
Azevedo, Roger
DOI:
10.18608/jla.2015.21.5
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
J. Learn. Anal.
影响因子:
--
作者:
Sonnenberg;Bannert
通讯作者:
Bannert