Global Tracking in Human Gliomas: A Comparison with Established Tracking Methods
Global Tracking in Human Gliomas: A Comparison with Established Tracking Methods
复制标题
人类神经胶质瘤的全局追踪:与现有追踪方法的比较
DOI:
10.1007/s00062-013-0198-x
复制
发表时间:
2013
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
I. Mader
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
T. Nguyen-Thanh;M. Reisert;C. Anastasopoulos;F. Hamzei;T. Reithmeier;M.S. Vry;V.G. Kiselev;A. Weyerbrock;I. Mader
Purpose Global tracking (GT) is a recently published fibre tractography (FT) method that takes simultaneously all fibres into account during their reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to compare this new method with fibre assignment by continuous tracking (FACT) and probabilistic tractography (PT) for the detection of the corticospinal tract (CST) in patients with gliomas. Methods Tractography of the CST was performed in 17 patients with eight low grade and nine anaplastic astrocytomas located in the motor cortex or the corticospinal tract. Diffusions metrics as fractional anisotropy (FA), mean (MD), axial (AD) and radial diffusivity (RD) were obtained. The methods were additionally applied on a physical phantom to assess their accuracy. Results PT was successful in all (100 %), GT in 16 (94 %) and FACT in 15 patients (88 %). The case where GT and FACT, both, missed the CST showed the highest AD and RD, whereas the one where FACT algorithm, alone, was not successfully showed the lowest AD and RD of the group. FA was reduced on the pathologic side (FApath 0.35 ± 0.16 (mean ± SD) versus FAcontralateral 0.51 ± 0.15, p corr < 0.03). RD was increased on the pathologic side (RDpath 0.67 ± 0.29 × 10− 3 mm2/s versus RDcontralateral 0.46 ± 0.08 × 10− 3 mm2/s, p corr < 0.03). In the phantom measurement, only GT did not detect false positive fibres at fibre crossings. Conclusion PT performed well even in areas of increased diffusivities indicating a severe oedema or disintegration of tissue. FACT was also susceptible to a decrease of diffusivities and to a susceptibility artefact, where GT was robust.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.96.18.10422
发表时间:
1999-08-31
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Conturo, TE;Lori, NF;Raichle, ME
通讯作者:
Raichle, ME
影响因子:
4.1
作者:
Morita, KI;Matsuzawa, H;Nakada, T
通讯作者:
Nakada, T
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Pannek, Kerstin;Chalk, Jonathan B.;Rose, Stephen E.
通讯作者:
Rose, Stephen E.
影响因子:
5.7
作者:
Reisert, Marco;Mader, Irina;Kiselev, Valerij
通讯作者:
Kiselev, Valerij