Neo-pragmatism and enactive intentionality
Neo-pragmatism and enactive intentionality
复制标题
新实用主义和主动意向性
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Katsunori Miyahara
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Gallagher;Katsunori Miyahara
认知科学中的生成方法提出，感知，更普遍的认知体验，强烈地由体现（感觉运动）过程介导，并且我们对世界的主要体验是面向行动或务实的（Noe，2004; Thompson，2007; Varela et al.，1991年）。扩展心智理论家提出，认知随附于身体和环境过程，如手势和各种技术的使用（Clark，2008; Clark and查尔默斯，1998; Menary，2010）。认知的生成概念和扩展概念都表明，心灵不是“在头脑中”--认知过程分布在大脑、身体和环境中--但它们在许多问题上也有所不同。扩展心灵理论家为认知的功能主义解释辩护，并淡化了身体的作用（例如，克拉克，2008年），他们认为认知和行动可以涉及心理表征（例如，Clark，1997; Clark and Grush，1999; Rowlands，2006;惠勒，2005）。相反，生成理论家主张激进的体现（例如，Thompson and Varela，2001），并为反代表主义观点辩护（例如，Gallagher，2008 b; Hutto，in press; Thompson，2007）.也有关于如何定义边界的争论，或缺乏边界，涉及认知过程（例如，Di Paolo，2009;惠勒，2008）。
Enactive approaches in cognitive science propose that perception, and more generally cognitive experience, are strongly mediated by embodied (sensory–motor) processes, and that our primary experience of the world is action-oriented or pragmatic (Noe, 2004; Thompson, 2007; Varela et al., 1991). Extended mind theorists propose that cognition supervenes on embodied and environmental processes such as gestures and the use of various technologies (Clark, 2008; Clark and Chalmers, 1998; Menary, 2010). Both enactive and extended conceptions of cognition suggest that the mind is not “in the head”–that cognitive processes are distributed over brain, body, and environment – but they also differ on a number of issues. Extended mind theorists defend a functionalist account of cognition and downplay the role of the body (e.g., Clark, 2008), and they argue that cognition and action can involve mental representations (e.g., Clark, 1997; Clark and Grush, 1999; Rowlands, 2006; Wheeler, 2005). In contrast, enactive theorists argue for radical embodiment (e.g., Thompson and Varela, 2001) and defend an antirepresentationalist view (e.g., Gallagher, 2008b; Hutto, in press; Thompson, 2007). There are also debates about how to define the boundaries, or lack of boundaries, involved in cognitive processes (e.g., Di Paolo, 2009; Wheeler, 2008).
影响因子：
1.4
作者：
Gallagher, S;Meltzoff, AN
通讯作者：
Meltzoff, AN
影响因子：
4
作者：
Song HJ;Baillargeon R
通讯作者：
Baillargeon R