The Novelty Penalty

The Novelty Penalty
复制标题

新颖性惩罚

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
Psychology Science
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Timothy D. Wilson
Timothy D. Wilson
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gus Cooney;D. Gilbert;Timothy D. Wilson

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

人们经常互相讲述他们过去的经历。但他们说的对吗?演讲者和听众预测听众会喜欢听新奇的故事(即,关于听众从未有过的经历的故事)多于熟悉的故事(即,关于听众已经有过的经历的故事)。事实上,听众更喜欢听熟悉的故事,而不是新奇的故事(研究1和2)。这并不是因为熟悉的故事和新奇的故事在内容或表达方式上有所不同(研究3)。相反,它的发生是因为人类的语言充满了信息空白,熟悉的故事允许听众使用自己的知识来填补这些空白(研究4)。我们讨论了为什么新奇的故事更难讲,为什么熟悉的故事听起来更愉快,比演讲者或听众所期望的。
People often tell each other stories about their past experiences. But do they tell the right ones? Speakers and listeners predicted that listeners would enjoy hearing novel stories (i.e., stories about experiences the listeners had never had) more than familiar stories (i.e., stories about experiences the listeners had already had). In fact, listeners enjoyed hearing familiar stories much more than novel ones (Studies 1 and 2). This did not happen because the familiar and novel stories differed in their content or delivery (Study 3). Rather, it happened because human speech is riddled with informational gaps, and familiar stories allow listeners to use their own knowledge to fill in those gaps (Study 4). We discuss reasons why novel stories are more difficult to tell, and why familiar stories are more enjoyable to hear, than either speakers or listeners expect.
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327
发表时间: 2004-09-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
Epley, N;Keysar, B;Gilovich, T
通讯作者: Gilovich, T
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.243
发表时间: 2006-02-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
Pinel, EC;Long, AE;Pyszczynski, T
通讯作者: Pyszczynski, T