Values as leverage points for sustainability transformation: two pathways for transformation research
Values as leverage points for sustainability transformation: two pathways for transformation research
复制标题
价值观作为可持续转型的杠杆点：转型研究的两条路径
DOI：
10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101205
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
7.2
通讯作者：
Andra Ioana Horcea
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Andra Ioana Horcea
关于可持续发展转型的新兴文献一致认为，价值观在转型研究议程中发挥着关键作用，尽管尚未阐明。最近将价值观与转型联系起来的文献越来越多地指出这样的假设：价值观可以作为可持续发展转型的杠杆点。然而，转型研究如何将价值观作为杠杆点仍然是一个关键的知识差距。在这里，我认为转型研究需要区分知识生产和动员的两种模式：线性的、知识优先的、模式 1 的科学，以及情境敏感的、线性竞争的、模式 2 的科学。基于这种区别，我确定了转型研究的两种互补途径，以有助于释放价值观的变革潜力。我澄清，针对价值观的干预措施依赖于对科学与社会之间以及研究的生产与治理之间的关系所采取的立场。关于价值作为杠杆点的知识需要从模式 1 和模式 2 科学角度产生。
The burgeoning literature on sustainability transformation agrees that values play a key, albeit unelucidated, role on the transformation research agenda. Recent literature linking values and transformation increasingly points toward the hypothesis that values may act as leverage points for sustainability transformation. However, how transformation research can engage with values as leverage points remains a critical knowledge gap. Here, I argue that transformation research needs to distinguish between two modes of knowledge production and mobilization: a linear, knowledge-first, mode-1 science, and a context-sensitive, linearity-contesting, mode-2 science. Based on this distinction, I identify two complementary pathways for transformation research to contribute to unleashing the transformative potential of values. I clarify that interventions targeting values rely on the stance taken on the relationship between science and society, and between production and governance of research. Knowledge about values as leverage points needs to be produced from both a mode-1 and mode-2 science perspective.
影响因子：
6.1
作者：
Chan, Kai M. A.;Boyd, David R.;Brondizio, Eduardo S.
通讯作者：
Brondizio, Eduardo S.
影响因子：
27.6
作者：
Caniglia, Guido;Luederitz, C.;Lang, D. J.
通讯作者：
Lang, D. J.