Development and Initial Validation of an Acute Readiness Monitoring Scale in Military Personnel.

Development and Initial Validation of an Acute Readiness Monitoring Scale in Military Personnel.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738609
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Crone D
Crone D
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Keegan RJ;Flood A;Niyonsenga T;Welvaert M;Rattray B;Sarkar M;Melberzs L;Crone D

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

许多专业的人员必须“随时准备”从事各种活动。管理个人和集体能力是领导层和决策者共同关心的问题。用于监测准备状态的典型现有方法涉及保存训练、健康和设备维护的详细记录,或者-不太常见-来自可穿戴设备的数据,这些数据可能难以解释,并引起隐私问题。一个广泛适用的、简单的心理测量方法,可以直接从人员那里对当前能力进行快速评估,这将是非常宝贵的。为了开发这一措施,我们进行了探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析的样本770名澳大利亚军人。32项急性准备监测量表(ARMS)表现出良好的模型拟合,包括9个因素:总体准备;身体准备;身体疲劳;认知准备;认知疲劳;威胁挑战(即,情绪/应对)准备;技能和培训准备;小组-团队准备和设备准备。准备因素与最近的压力,目前的负面影响和痛苦呈负相关,与弹性,幸福感,目前的积极影响和主管的士兵准备的评级呈正相关。ARMS的发展促进了一系列新的研究机会:能够快速,简单和易于解释的个人和团体准备评估。
Personnel in many professions must remain “ready” to perform diverse activities. Managing individual and collective capability is a common concern for leadership and decision makers. Typical existing approaches for monitoring readiness involve keeping detailed records of training, health and equipment maintenance, or – less commonly – data from wearable devices that can be difficult to interpret as well as raising privacy concerns. A widely applicable, simple psychometric measure of perceived readiness would be invaluable in generating rapid evaluations of current capability directly from personnel. To develop this measure, we conducted exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis with a sample of 770 Australian military personnel. The 32-item Acute Readiness Monitoring Scale (ARMS) demonstrated good model fit, and comprised nine factors: overall readiness; physical readiness; physical fatigue; cognitive readiness; cognitive fatigue; threat-challenge (i.e., emotional/coping) readiness; skills-and-training readiness; group-team readiness, and equipment readiness. Readiness factors were negatively correlated with recent stress, current negative affect and distress, and positively correlated with resilience, wellbeing, current positive affect and a supervisor’s rating of solider readiness. The development of the ARMS facilitates a range of new research opportunities: enabling quick, simple and easily interpreted assessment of individual and group readiness.
DOI: 10.1123/jsep.33.1.75
发表时间: 2011-02-01
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Bartholomew, Kimberley J.;Ntoumanis, Nikos;Thogersen-Ntoumani, Cecilie
通讯作者: Thogersen-Ntoumani, Cecilie
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.274
发表时间: 2007-05-01
影响因子: 4.9
作者:
Bakker, Arnold B.;Hakanen, Jari J.;Xanthopoulou, Despoina
通讯作者: Xanthopoulou, Despoina
DOI: 10.1080/10705510903008204
发表时间: 2009-01-01
影响因子: 6
作者:
Asparouhov, Tihomir;Muthen, Bengt
通讯作者: Muthen, Bengt
DOI: 10.1080/21641846.2018.1558733
发表时间: 2019-01-01
影响因子: 2.8
作者:
Boolani, Ali;O'Connor, Patrick J.;Mondal, Sumona
通讯作者: Mondal, Sumona
DOI: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000006
发表时间: 2010-01-01
影响因子: 1.6
作者:
Bakker, Arnold B.;van Veldhoven, Marc;Xanthopoulou, Despoina
通讯作者: Xanthopoulou, Despoina