Silvopastoral systems benefit invertebrate biodiversity on tropical livestock farms in Caquetá, Colombia

Silvopastoral systems benefit invertebrate biodiversity on tropical livestock farms in Caquetá, Colombia
复制标题

林牧系统有利于哥伦比亚卡克塔热带畜牧场的无脊椎动物生物多样性

DOI:
10.1111/afe.12594
复制
发表时间:
2023
影响因子:
1.6
通讯作者:
Kinneen L
Kinneen L
中科院分区:
农林科学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kinneen L

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在哥伦比亚亚马逊地区,原始森林的长期和持续损失威胁着生物多样性和减缓气候变化。将树木纳入畜牧业生产的森林放牧做法有助于解决当地经济和更广泛的环境挑战。我们的目的是评估森林放牧对哥伦比亚卡奎特<e:1>小农农场无脊椎动物群落的影响。采用扫网法和诱捕法,对传统牧草、林草和林缘生境的无脊椎动物群落进行了比较。利用扫网采集的无脊椎动物群落在不同生境类型间进行了对比,传统牧场与林缘生境间存在显著差异,林缘生境的多样性和均匀度高于传统牧场。似乎森林牧区通过支持与传统牧场和森林边缘相似的无脊椎动物群落,可能充当了一个中间栖息地。在无脊椎动物单目比较中,鳞翅目和鞘翅目在森林边缘生境中数量较多,而半翅目在传统牧场中数量较多。半足类动物通常是牧草系统中饲料植物的害虫,这些丰度的差异可能对生态系统的服务和危害产生影响。森林放牧方法不能取代原生森林支持的独特生物多样性,但如果与景观相结合,可以为无脊椎动物保护和生态系统服务带来好处。
In the Colombian Amazon, there has been long‐term and sustained loss of primary forest threatening biodiversity and climate change mitigation. Silvopastoral practices that integrate trees into livestock production could help address both local economic and wider environmental challenges.We aimed to assess the effects of silvopastoral practices on invertebrate communities on smallholder farms in Caquetá, Colombia. Using sweep nets and malaise trapping, invertebrate communities were compared between traditional pasture, silvopasture and forest edge habitats.Invertebrate communities collected using sweep nets were contrasting among habitat types, communities were significantly different between traditional pasture and forest edge habitats and diversity and evenness were greatest in forest edges compared to traditional pastures. It appears that silvopasture areas, by supporting similar invertebrate assemblages to both traditional pasture and forest edges, may be acting as an intermediate habitat.When individual invertebrate orders were compared, Lepidoptera and Coleoptera were found in greater abundance in the forest edge habitats, while Hemiptera were more abundant in traditional pasture. Hemipterans are often pests of forage plants in pasture systems and these differences in abundance may have implications for ecosystem services and disservices.Silvopastoral approaches cannot replace the unique biodiversity supported by native forests but could deliver benefits for invertebrate conservation and ecosystem services if integrated into landscapes.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1800042115
发表时间: 2018-08-14
影响因子: 11.1
作者:
Karp DS;Chaplin-Kramer R;Meehan TD;Martin EA;DeClerck F;Grab H;Gratton C;Hunt L;Larsen AE;Martínez-Salinas A;O'Rourke ME;Rusch A;Poveda K;Jonsson M;Rosenheim JA;Schellhorn NA;Tscharntke T;Wratten SD;Zhang W;Iverson AL;Adler LS;Albrecht M;Alignier A;Angelella GM;Zubair Anjum M;Avelino J;Batáry P;Baveco JM;Bianchi FJJA;Birkhofer K;Bohnenblust EW;Bommarco R;Brewer MJ;Caballero-López B;Carrière Y;Carvalheiro LG;Cayuela L;Centrella M;Ćetković A;Henri DC;Chabert A;Costamagna AC;De la Mora A;de Kraker J;Desneux N;Diehl E;Diekötter T;Dormann CF;Eckberg JO;Entling MH;Fiedler D;Franck P;Frank van Veen FJ;Frank T;Gagic V;Garratt MPD;Getachew A;Gonthier DJ;Goodell PB;Graziosi I;Groves RL;Gurr GM;Hajian-Forooshani Z;Heimpel GE;Herrmann JD;Huseth AS;Inclán DJ;Ingrao AJ;Iv P;Jacot K;Johnson GA;Jones L;Kaiser M;Kaser JM;Keasar T;Kim TN;Kishinevsky M;Landis DA;Lavandero B;Lavigne C;Le Ralec A;Lemessa D;Letourneau DK;Liere H;Lu Y;Lubin Y;Luttermoser T;Maas B;Mace K;Madeira F;Mader V;Cortesero AM;Marini L;Martinez E;Martinson HM;Menozzi P;Mitchell MGE;Miyashita T;Molina GAR;Molina-Montenegro MA;O'Neal ME;Opatovsky I;Ortiz-Martinez S;Nash M;Östman Ö;Ouin A;Pak D;Paredes D;Parsa S;Parry H;Perez-Alvarez R;Perović DJ;Peterson JA;Petit S;Philpott SM;Plantegenest M;Plećaš M;Pluess T;Pons X;Potts SG;Pywell RF;Ragsdale DW;Rand TA;Raymond L;Ricci B;Sargent C;Sarthou JP;Saulais J;Schäckermann J;Schmidt NP;Schneider G;Schüepp C;Sivakoff FS;Smith HG;Stack Whitney K;Stutz S;Szendrei Z;Takada MB;Taki H;Tamburini G;Thomson LJ;Tricault Y;Tsafack N;Tschumi M;Valantin-Morison M;Van Trinh M;van der Werf W;Vierling KT;Werling BP;Wickens JB;Wickens VJ;Woodcock BA;Wyckhuys K;Xiao H;Yasuda M;Yoshioka A;Zou Y
通讯作者: Zou Y
生物多样性、生产力高且社会公正的森林牧场:巴西旱地的解决方案
DOI: --
发表时间: 2020
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Felipe M. Pinheiro;P. Hunt
通讯作者: P. Hunt
林业种植园可以支持什么水平的本地甲虫多样性?
DOI: --
发表时间: 2021
影响因子: 3.5
作者:
Pablo A. López‐Bedoya;T. Magura;Felicity A. Edwards;D. Edwards;J. Rey‐Benayas;G. Lövei;J. Noriega
通讯作者: J. Noriega
环境过滤是地甲虫在森林及其边缘的主要聚集规则,但在邻近的草原上则不然
DOI: --
发表时间: 2019
期刊: Insect Science
影响因子: 4
作者:
T. Magura;G. Lövei
通讯作者: G. Lövei
联合固氮、C4 光合作用以及作为新热带甘蔗和牧草主要害虫的飞蛾(半翅目:鹿科)的进化
DOI: --
发表时间: 2004
影响因子: 1.9
作者:
V. Thompson
通讯作者: V. Thompson